Zobrazeno 1 - 10
of 86
pro vyhledávání: '"Erik Voeten"'
Autor:
Erik Voeten
Publikováno v:
Verfassungsblog, Iss 2366-7044 (2022)
The European Court of Human Rights (ECtHR) is operating in an increasingly challenging political and legal environment. Even if member states have stopped short of far-reaching reforms, they have signaled their collective desire for a more restrained
Externí odkaz:
https://doaj.org/article/8a24690caa8f4bd8a5cc911496c17175
Autor:
Laurence R. Helfer, Erik Voeten
Publikováno v:
Revista Jurídica Austral, Vol 2, Iss 2 (2021)
Jueces y académicos llevan mucho tiempo debatiendo si el Tribunal Europeo de Derechos Humanos (en adelante, TEDH o el Tribunal) puede solo ampliar la protección de los derechos humanos en Europa, pero nunca disminuirlos. Estudios recientes han cons
Externí odkaz:
https://doaj.org/article/3c23cb2b1e404b2f8b3295a448554167
Publikováno v:
International Studies Perspectives.
What does the decline in paradigmatic self-identification mean for how international relations (IR) scholars think about the world? We answer this question with a 2020 survey among nearly two thousand IR scholars. We uncover a two-dimensional latent
Externí odkaz:
https://explore.openaire.eu/search/publication?articleId=doi_________::a7ef3365efd5e3aa11eb72e13fd60443
https://doi.org/10.1093/isp/ekac012
https://doi.org/10.1093/isp/ekac012
Autor:
Laurence R Helfer, Erik Voeten
Publikováno v:
European Journal of International Law. 32:907-914
Over the last decade, scholars have debated whether the shifting landscape of individual rights protection in Europe has influenced the decisions of the European Court of Human Rights (ECtHR). In our article, ‘Walking Back Human Rights in Europe?
Externí odkaz:
https://explore.openaire.eu/search/publication?articleId=doi_________::24792bee063723a2f776e2f52f2709ac
https://doi.org/10.1093/ejil/chab058
https://doi.org/10.1093/ejil/chab058
Autor:
Erik Voeten
Publikováno v:
International Studies Review. 24
Many of the most visible examples of the backlash against multilateralism, globalization, and democracy do not target free trade, investment, or elections directly, but the judicial institutions that were created to protect the rights of traders, inv
Externí odkaz:
https://explore.openaire.eu/search/publication?articleId=doi_________::ef54a7246381f9410957e679ac66fe80
https://doi.org/10.1093/isr/viac015
https://doi.org/10.1093/isr/viac015
Autor:
Erik Voeten, Alexander Kentikelenis
Publikováno v:
The Review of International Organizations
Funder: University of Cambridge
The liberal international economic order has been facing high-profile legitimacy challenges in recent years. This article puts these challenges in historical context through a systematic analysis of rhetorical cha
The liberal international economic order has been facing high-profile legitimacy challenges in recent years. This article puts these challenges in historical context through a systematic analysis of rhetorical cha
Externí odkaz:
https://explore.openaire.eu/search/publication?articleId=doi_dedup___::657d3874b00a3f34bd723900233851bd
http://europepmc.org/articles/PMC7546938
http://europepmc.org/articles/PMC7546938
Autor:
Laurence R. Helfer, Erik Voeten
Publikováno v:
European Journal of International Law. 31:797-827
Judges and scholars have long debated whether the European Court of Human Rights (the ECtHR or the Court) can only expand, never diminish, human rights protections in Europe. Recent studies have found that political backlashes and national-level rest
Externí odkaz:
https://explore.openaire.eu/search/publication?articleId=doi_dedup___::e1ab6575c346494af9dc37643e8fd30a
https://doi.org/10.1093/ejil/chaa071
https://doi.org/10.1093/ejil/chaa071
Autor:
Erik Voeten
Publikováno v:
SSRN Electronic Journal.
Externí odkaz:
https://explore.openaire.eu/search/publication?articleId=doi_________::b32f396aaaab0e0178d26e3a2f872bfe
https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.4308819
https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.4308819
Publikováno v:
Madsen, M R, Mayoral, J A, Strezhnev, A & Voeten, E 2022, ' Sovereignty, Substance, and Public Support for European Courts’ Human Rights Rulings ', American Political Science Review, vol. 116, no. 2, pp. 419-438 . https://doi.org/10.1017/S0003055421001143
Is the public backlash against human rights rulings from European courts driven by substantive concerns over case outcomes, procedural concerns over sovereignty, or combinations thereof? We conducted preregistered survey experiments in Denmark, Franc
Externí odkaz:
https://explore.openaire.eu/search/publication?articleId=doi_dedup___::78773d2cd98021320cf17e26704bb547
https://curis.ku.dk/ws/files/358425028/sovereignty_substance_and_public_support_for_european_courts_human_rights_rulings.pdf
https://curis.ku.dk/ws/files/358425028/sovereignty_substance_and_public_support_for_european_courts_human_rights_rulings.pdf
