Zobrazeno 1 - 10
of 16
pro vyhledávání: '"Elena Lisanyuk"'
Autor:
Elena Lisanyuk
Publikováno v:
SCHOLE, Vol 11, Iss 1, Pp 61-77 (2017)
The famous dispute between Protagoras and Euathlus concerning Protagoras’s tuition fee reportedly owed to him by Euathlus is solved on the basis of practical argumentation concerning actions. The dispute is widely viewed as a kind of a logical para
Externí odkaz:
https://doaj.org/article/96408ddf2d7544609919051fccceeeb7
Autor:
Elena Lisanyuk
Publikováno v:
Problemos, Vol 88, Iss 88 (2015)
Straipsnyje pateikiamas loginis-kognityvinis požiūris į argumentaciją ir teigiama, kad argumentacija suponuoja, jog į ją įsitraukę protingi veikėjai pasižymi kognityvine įvairove. Autorės prieiga leidžia įvesti skirtis tarp pagrindimo,
Externí odkaz:
https://doaj.org/article/c2cb81c1ec1e468c9bb6feb3c56805e8
Autor:
Elena Lisanyuk
Publikováno v:
Revista da Faculdade de Direito da Universidade Federal de Minas Gerais, Iss 63 (2014)
Responsibility has entered the academic discourse of logicians hardly more than few decades ago. I suggest a logical concept of responsibility which employs ideas both from a number of theories belonging to different branches of logic as well from ot
Externí odkaz:
https://doaj.org/article/cb69073c7f3241a9b3b409edac971de4
Autor:
Elena Lisanyuk
Publikováno v:
Studia Humana. 11:30-45
In 2018, three journalists accused one of the Members of the Russian Parliament of harassment at workplace. Many influential persons of the Russian elite engaged themselves in the public discussion of the conflict. We studied that high-profiled discu
Externí odkaz:
https://explore.openaire.eu/search/publication?articleId=doi_________::8fa9f3ff884db56d40a83a3573e40739
https://doi.org/10.2478/sh-2022-0014
https://doi.org/10.2478/sh-2022-0014
Publikováno v:
Studia Humana. 11:1-5
In this paper, we introduce the subject of the special issue Trends in Argumentation Logic. Here we mainly describe two approaches to argumentation logic with explicating monotonic and non-monotonic, or defeasible, reasoning and explain the role of a
Externí odkaz:
https://explore.openaire.eu/search/publication?articleId=doi_________::6f3e809d141645c736a8f7e3d93b7ee9
https://doi.org/10.2478/sh-2022-0010
https://doi.org/10.2478/sh-2022-0010
Autor:
Elena Lisanyuk
Publikováno v:
Discourse. 8:5-16
Introduction. In the article we defend a claim that criticisms and counterarguments play a more important role in modeling and evaluating arguments than defending and supporting the thesis. The novelty of this idea lies in that it shifts the main foc
Externí odkaz:
https://explore.openaire.eu/search/publication?articleId=doi_________::4188bcaf58a66b9c4bbd0e4413921781
https://doi.org/10.32603/2412-8562-2022-8-2-5-16
https://doi.org/10.32603/2412-8562-2022-8-2-5-16
Autor:
Elena Lisanyuk
Publikováno v:
Аналитическая философия: траектории истории и векторы развития. Сборник научных трудов Международной научной конференции, посвященной 80-летию научного руководителя Института философии и права СО РАН В.В. Целищева.
Externí odkaz:
https://explore.openaire.eu/search/publication?articleId=doi_________::c4159582a994d44809ffe818b34f71dd
https://doi.org/10.47850/s.2022.1.6
https://doi.org/10.47850/s.2022.1.6
Autor:
Elena Lisanyuk
Publikováno v:
Logiko-filosofskie studii; Том 19, № 1 (2021); 112-116
Логико-философские штудии; Том 19, № 1 (2021); 112-116
Логико-философские штудии; Том 19, № 1 (2021); 112-116
In his treatise ‘On Certainty’ (1969) L. Wittgenstein compared the propositions ex- pressing basic principles to the hinges enabling both doubting and justifying knowledge. In 1985 Robert Fogelin proposed the conception of deep disagreement in ar
Externí odkaz:
https://explore.openaire.eu/search/publication?articleId=doi_dedup___::50a3505e6d17bb91949fd9f312727a2e
http://ojs.philosophy.spbu.ru/index.php/lphs/article/view/706
http://ojs.philosophy.spbu.ru/index.php/lphs/article/view/706
Autor:
Elena Lisanyuk, Evelina Barbashina
Publikováno v:
Studia Humana, Vol 7, Iss 4, Pp 30-38 (2018)
In this paper we discuss L. Petrażycki’s idea of norm as a normative relation and show its repercussions in two perspectives connected to each other, in the legal theory in the framework of which it was originally introduced and where its role was
Externí odkaz:
https://explore.openaire.eu/search/publication?articleId=doi_dedup___::367c9b0739b2593cc4acba3676feeb44
https://doi.org/10.2478/sh-2018-0021
https://doi.org/10.2478/sh-2018-0021