Zobrazeno 1 - 10
of 787
pro vyhledávání: '"Donald C. Clarke"'
Autor:
Kinkel, Jonathan J.
Publikováno v:
Journal of East Asian Studies, 2010 Jan 01. 10(1), 157-160.
Externí odkaz:
https://www.jstor.org/stable/23418884
Autor:
Hawes, Colin
Publikováno v:
The China Journal, 2010 Jan 01(63), 192-195.
Externí odkaz:
https://www.jstor.org/stable/20749217
Autor:
Wallacker, Benjamin E.
Publikováno v:
Journal of Asian History, 2009 Jan 01. 43(1), 87-88.
Externí odkaz:
https://www.jstor.org/stable/41933523
Autor:
Jonathan J. Kinkel
Publikováno v:
Journal of East Asian Studies. 10:157-160
Autor:
Donald C. Clarke
Publikováno v:
The American Journal of Comparative Law. 68:55-94
Comparative law is haunted by the perceived need to avoid Orientalism: a type of analysis that postulates a dichotomy between the object of study and “the West,” finds the object lacking in certain essential qualities (or even having the opposite
Autor:
Donald C. Clarke
Publikováno v:
SSRN Electronic Journal.
Autor:
Donald C. Clarke
Publikováno v:
SSRN Electronic Journal.
Autor:
Fang Lu, Donald C. Clarke
Publikováno v:
The American Journal of Comparative Law. 65:751-798
Local government financing vehicles (LGFVs)—companies capitalized and owned by local government and established for the purpose of raising funds for municipal infrastructure construction—emerged in China in the 1980s as a response to the severe c
The Zhong Lun Declaration on the Obligations of Huawei and Other Chinese Companies under Chinese Law
Autor:
Donald C. Clarke
Publikováno v:
SSRN Electronic Journal.
This memorandum analyzes a declaration submitted to the Federal Communications Commission in May 2018 by two attorneys from the Zhong Lun law firm in China. The declaration supports Huawei's position that it cannot be compelled under Chinese law to t
Autor:
Christopher Balding, Donald C. Clarke
Publikováno v:
SSRN Electronic Journal.
As Huawei has come under increasing scrutiny over the last several months, the question of who really owns and controls it has come to the fore. Huawei calls itself “employee-owned,” but this claim is questionable, and the corporate structure des