Zobrazeno 1 - 10
of 34
pro vyhledávání: '"Dima Mohammed"'
Autor:
Dima Mohammed, Marcin Lewiński
Publikováno v:
Journal of Deliberative Democracy, Vol 8, Iss 1 (2012)
By looking at the argumentative uses of ‘status updates’, we discuss how Facebook design and context of use influenced opportunities for deliberation during the Egyptian phase of the Arab Spring in early 2011. Our basic point is that, somewhat ag
Externí odkaz:
https://doaj.org/article/222c846d034f498e8cf9d7d170e7fe9c
Autor:
Dima Mohammed
When political actors respond to criticism by pointing at an inconsistency in the critic's position, a tricky political practice emerges. Turning the criticism back to the critic can be a constructive move that restores coherence, but it may also be
Autor:
Marcin Lewiński, Dima Mohammed
The goal of this volume is to further the examination of the role, shape, and quality of argumentation in political deliberation. The chapters collected in the volume employ the concepts and methods developed within argumentation theory to investigat
Autor:
Dima Mohammed
Publikováno v:
Topoi. 42:625-634
In this paper, I examine the question of commitment transmissibility in public political arguments. I explore the idea that under certain conditions, arguers become accountable for the commitments of their “argumentative associates” (Mohammed 201
Autor:
Dima Mohammed
Publikováno v:
Journal of Argumentation in Context. 11:88-109
This paper develops an argumentative perspective on attacks in political election campaigns. The perspective highlights the role that attack ads play in the justification of vote claims aiming to advance our understanding of the notorious practice an
Autor:
Dima Mohammed
Publikováno v:
Journal of Argumentation in Context. 9:428-432
Autor:
Maria Grazia Rossi, Dima Mohammed
Publikováno v:
The Pandemic of Argumentation ISBN: 9783030910167
Doubt is a double-edge sword. On the one hand, uncertainty is essential for epistemic progress, and yet, doubt can also make us vulnerable to deception, confused to the point of no longer knowing what is true. What distinguishes a doubt that is epist
Externí odkaz:
https://explore.openaire.eu/search/publication?articleId=doi_________::b4af6d7148b83bf6de1de4b54df9906f
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-91017-4_7
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-91017-4_7
Autor:
Marcin Lewiński, Dima Mohammed
Publikováno v:
Journal of Argumentation in Context. 8:65-90
The paper applies argumentative discourse analysis to a corpus of official statements made by key players (USA, EU, China, India, etc.) at the opening of the 2015 Paris Climate Conference. The chief goal is to reveal the underlying structure of pract
Autor:
David Zarefsky, Dima Mohammed
Publikováno v:
Vox Populi ISBN: 9781789901412
Externí odkaz:
https://explore.openaire.eu/search/publication?articleId=doi_________::df3d21a569cf68dd1d3d7a6d4dc890b9
https://doi.org/10.4337/9781789901412.00007
https://doi.org/10.4337/9781789901412.00007
Autor:
Frank Zenker, Jan Albert van Laar, Pedro Abreu, Mette Bengtsson, Paula Castro, Istvan Danka, Barbara De Cock, Catharina Duthil Novaes, Lea Farine, Anca Gata, Sara Greco, Davide Grossi, Tvrtko Jolić, David Lanius, Marcin Lewinski, Christoph Lumer, Pawel Lupkowski, Dima Mohammed, Steve Oswald, Maciej Pichlak, Erich Rast, Juho Ritola, Javier Rodríguez-Alcázar, Karim Sadek, Blake Scott, Isidora Stojanovic, Christopher Tindale, Mariusz Urbanski, Jean H.M. Wagemans
This position paper of Working Group 2 of the European Network for Argumentation and Public Policy Analysis (COST Action CA17132; https://publicpolicyargument.eu) reviews goals and functions of public argumentation. Drawing on a variety of discipline
Externí odkaz:
https://explore.openaire.eu/search/publication?articleId=doi_dedup___::2022f3b8290926c002a3aa552ee92b31
https://doi.org/10.31235/osf.io/ezub8
https://doi.org/10.31235/osf.io/ezub8