Zobrazeno 1 - 10
of 103
pro vyhledávání: '"Dickinson, Gregory"'
Autor:
Dickinson, Gregory M.
Publikováno v:
99 NYU L. Rev. Online 109 (2024)
The steady flow of social-media cases toward the Supreme Court shows a nation reworking its fundamental relationship with technology. The cases raise a host of questions ranging from difficult to impossible: how to nurture a vibrant public square whe
Externí odkaz:
http://arxiv.org/abs/2404.02273
LegalBench: A Collaboratively Built Benchmark for Measuring Legal Reasoning in Large Language Models
Autor:
Guha, Neel, Nyarko, Julian, Ho, Daniel E., Ré, Christopher, Chilton, Adam, Narayana, Aditya, Chohlas-Wood, Alex, Peters, Austin, Waldon, Brandon, Rockmore, Daniel N., Zambrano, Diego, Talisman, Dmitry, Hoque, Enam, Surani, Faiz, Fagan, Frank, Sarfaty, Galit, Dickinson, Gregory M., Porat, Haggai, Hegland, Jason, Wu, Jessica, Nudell, Joe, Niklaus, Joel, Nay, John, Choi, Jonathan H., Tobia, Kevin, Hagan, Margaret, Ma, Megan, Livermore, Michael, Rasumov-Rahe, Nikon, Holzenberger, Nils, Kolt, Noam, Henderson, Peter, Rehaag, Sean, Goel, Sharad, Gao, Shang, Williams, Spencer, Gandhi, Sunny, Zur, Tom, Iyer, Varun, Li, Zehua
The advent of large language models (LLMs) and their adoption by the legal community has given rise to the question: what types of legal reasoning can LLMs perform? To enable greater study of this question, we present LegalBench: a collaboratively co
Externí odkaz:
http://arxiv.org/abs/2308.11462
Autor:
Dickinson, Gregory M.
Lawmakers around the country are crafting new laws to target "dark patterns" -- user interface designs that trick or coerce users into enabling cell phone location tracking, sharing browsing data, initiating automatic billing, or making whatever othe
Externí odkaz:
http://arxiv.org/abs/2307.07888
Autor:
Dickinson, Gregory M.
Publikováno v:
33 Harv. J.L. & Pub. Pol'y 1177 (2010)
In Wyeth v. Levine the Supreme Court once again failed to reconcile the interpretive presumption against preemption with the sometimes competing Chevron doctrine of deference to agencies' reasonable statutory interpretations. Rather than resolve the
Externí odkaz:
http://arxiv.org/abs/2306.04771
Autor:
Dickinson, Gregory M.
Publikováno v:
89 Geo. Wash. L. Rev. 347 (2021)
We do everything online. We shop, travel, invest, socialize, and even hold garage sales. Even though we may not care whether a company operates online or in the physical world, however, the question has dramatic consequences for the companies themsel
Externí odkaz:
http://arxiv.org/abs/2306.02876
Autor:
Dickinson, Gregory M.
Publikováno v:
55 Ind. L. Rev. 101 (2022)
Online platforms have completely transformed American social life. They have democratized publication, overthrown old gatekeepers, and given ordinary Americans a fresh voice in politics. But the system is beginning to falter. Control over online spee
Externí odkaz:
http://arxiv.org/abs/2306.02874
Autor:
Dickinson, Gregory M.
Publikováno v:
33 Stan. L. & Pol'y Rev. Online 1 (2022)
Internet immunity doctrine is broken. Under Section 230 of the Communications Decency Act of 1996, online entities are absolutely immune from lawsuits related to content authored by third parties. The law has been essential to the internet's developm
Externí odkaz:
http://arxiv.org/abs/2306.02875
Autor:
Dickinson, Gregory M.
Publikováno v:
63 Admin. L. Rev. 667 (2011)
Now almost three decades since its seminal Chevron decision, the Supreme Court has yet to articulate how that case's doctrine of deference to agency statutory interpretations relates to one of the most compelling federalism issues of our time: regula
Externí odkaz:
http://arxiv.org/abs/2306.04463
Autor:
Dickinson, Gregory M.
Publikováno v:
89 Neb. L. Rev. 682 (2011)
The Supreme Court's federal preemption decisions are notoriously unpredictable. Traditional left-right voting alignments break down in the face of competing ideological pulls. The breakdown of predictable voting blocs leaves the business interests mo
Externí odkaz:
http://arxiv.org/abs/2306.04462
Autor:
Dickinson, Gregory M.
Publikováno v:
33 Harv. J.L. & Pub. Pol'y 863 (2010)
Almost all courts to interpret Section 230 of the Communications Decency Act have construed its ambiguously worded immunity provision broadly, shielding Internet intermediaries from tort liability so long as they are not the literal authors of offens
Externí odkaz:
http://arxiv.org/abs/2306.04461