Zobrazeno 1 - 10
of 29
pro vyhledávání: '"Despoina Mantzari"'
Autor:
Germain Gaudin, Despoina Mantzari
Publikováno v:
Journal of European Competition Law & Practice. 13:125-135
Autor:
Despoina Mantzari
This chapter considers the institutional disadvantages of the courts that may warrant a high degree of deference, namely lack of economic expertise, limited access to information, lack of requisite institutional legitimacy, and courts’ susceptibili
Externí odkaz:
https://explore.openaire.eu/search/publication?articleId=doi_________::0d2a0b9056b50d46a54bbf3fc2933a51
https://doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780198851608.003.0007
https://doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780198851608.003.0007
Autor:
Despoina Mantzari
This concluding chapter is divided into two parts. The first part elaborates on the main findings and contribution of the study. The second part outlines the future role of economic evidence in the regulatory enterprise, considering the monumental so
Externí odkaz:
https://explore.openaire.eu/search/publication?articleId=doi_________::43838e87db5efa7095b77f2913a397a8
https://doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780198851608.003.0008
https://doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780198851608.003.0008
Autor:
Despoina Mantzari
Relying on semi-structured interviews with UK sectoral regulators, this chapter opens the ‘black box’ of the regulatory decision-making process and explores the influence of economic evidence and analysis on the regulators’ discretionary econom
Externí odkaz:
https://explore.openaire.eu/search/publication?articleId=doi_________::dd007c7079a38866096b17ebe7e6c37f
https://doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780198851608.003.0004
https://doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780198851608.003.0004
Autor:
Despoina Mantzari
This chapter provides a map of the relevant institutional landscape and sets the scene for the comparative institutional analysis. It first introduces the main actors involved in the regulatory process in the US and the UK and then examines, in a sys
Externí odkaz:
https://explore.openaire.eu/search/publication?articleId=doi_________::5091673715555b6bcb10c1288655f7ce
https://doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780198851608.003.0003
https://doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780198851608.003.0003
Autor:
Despoina Mantzari
This book explores the interaction of courts and regulators with economic evidence in the realm of utilities regulation in two common law jurisdictions: the US and the UK. Adopting the error-correction function of judicial review as a starting point,
Externí odkaz:
https://explore.openaire.eu/search/publication?articleId=doi_________::72dc7c6336b6ed7d5bea8659c6fbddd5
https://doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780198851608.001.0001
https://doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780198851608.001.0001
Autor:
Despoina Mantzari
This chapter examines the determinants of judicial scrutiny of economic evidence at the specialist UK Competition Appeal Tribunal. These range from the Tribunal’s membership and composition, its subject-matter expertise, its own self perception of
Externí odkaz:
https://explore.openaire.eu/search/publication?articleId=doi_________::7298cea42caaa51e136b83f87e0d366d
https://doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780198851608.003.0006
https://doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780198851608.003.0006
Autor:
Despoina Mantzari
This chapter begins with some essential preliminary work that distinguishes economics from natural sciences and then explains how economic evidence is incorporated in rulemaking and adjudication and the specific challenges it raises for the error-cor
Externí odkaz:
https://explore.openaire.eu/search/publication?articleId=doi_________::9dacb2495be86993232834140b7b3036
https://doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780198851608.003.0002
https://doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780198851608.003.0002
Autor:
Despoina Mantzari
This chapter examines the US federal courts’ reaction to the regulatory agencies’ increased recourse to expert economic evidence and analysis. It argues that an evolutionary transformation of the scope and nature of judicial review has taken plac
Externí odkaz:
https://explore.openaire.eu/search/publication?articleId=doi_________::f92b3b5aef9e79ad8054ef922a13ffc6
https://doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780198851608.003.0005
https://doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780198851608.003.0005
Publikováno v:
Law & Policy. 42:382-403