Zobrazeno 1 - 8
of 8
pro vyhledávání: '"Dearbhail Bracken-Roche"'
Publikováno v:
Health Research Policy and Systems, Vol 15, Iss 1, Pp 1-4 (2017)
Externí odkaz:
https://doaj.org/article/6f7fa806d26f43929f9baef68443953a
Publikováno v:
Journal of empirical research on human research ethics : JERHRE. 15(3)
The concept of vulnerability plays a central role in research ethics in signaling that certain research participants warrant more careful consideration because their risk of harm is heightened due to their participation in research. Despite scholarly
Autor:
Eric Racine, Dearbhail Bracken-Roche
Publikováno v:
Bioethics. 33:19-34
The concept of vulnerability is widely used in research ethics to signal attention to participants who require special protections in research. However, this concept is vague and under-theorized. There is also growing concern that the dominant catego
Publikováno v:
Handbook of clinical neurology. 162
Predicting neurologic outcomes for neonates with acute brain injury is essential for guiding the development of treatment goals and appropriate care plans in collaboration with parents and families. Prognostication helps parents imagine their child's
Predicting neurologic outcomes for neonates with acute brain injury is essential for guiding the development of treatment goals and appropriate care plans in collaboration with parents and families. Prognostication helps parents imagine their child's
Externí odkaz:
https://explore.openaire.eu/search/publication?articleId=doi_________::13987b3e05449b22e7180bedc74c485c
https://doi.org/10.1016/b978-0-444-64029-1.00024-2
https://doi.org/10.1016/b978-0-444-64029-1.00024-2
Publikováno v:
Accountability in Research. 21:331-352
The classification of surgical innovation as clinical care, research, or as third distinct type of activity creates ambiguity which impacts standards for disclosure and informed consent. We conducted a systematic review of the conceptual literature t
Publikováno v:
Health Research Policy and Systems. 15(1)
The concept of vulnerability has held a central place in research ethics guidance since its introduction in the United States Belmont Report in 1979. It signals mindfulness for researchers and research ethics boards to the possibility that some parti