Zobrazeno 1 - 10
of 45
pro vyhledávání: '"David W. Congdon"'
Autor:
W. Travis McMaken, David W. Congdon
Karl Barth was an eminently conversational theologian, and with the Internet revolution, we live today in an eminently conversational age. Being the proceedings of the 2010 Karl Barth Blog Conference, Karl Barth in Conversation brings these two facto
Demythologizing Revelation: A Critical Continuation of Rudolf Bultmann's Project by Chester O'Gorman
Autor:
David W. Congdon
Publikováno v:
Lutheran Quarterly. 36:87-89
Externí odkaz:
https://explore.openaire.eu/search/publication?articleId=doi_________::0c1c2e91f5e95052d1be2940c08ba080
https://doi.org/10.1353/lut.2022.0011
https://doi.org/10.1353/lut.2022.0011
Autor:
David W. Congdon
Publikováno v:
International Journal of Systematic Theology. 20:597-600
Externí odkaz:
https://explore.openaire.eu/search/publication?articleId=doi_________::575cded1ad5488544ebef8f9f5307ad0
https://doi.org/10.1111/ijst.12320
https://doi.org/10.1111/ijst.12320
Autor:
David W. Congdon
Publikováno v:
Theology Today. 75:51-63
The apocalyptic interpretation of the New Testament was developed in the mid-twentieth century in explicit opposition to the work of Rudolf Bultmann, and this conflict has persisted despite the changes that have taken place within the field of apocal
Externí odkaz:
https://explore.openaire.eu/search/publication?articleId=doi_________::f7ec5adbcba6df17f51979971080d1d4
https://doi.org/10.1177/0040573618763574
https://doi.org/10.1177/0040573618763574
Autor:
David W. Congdon
Publikováno v:
Journal of Theological Interpretation. 11:101-117
In a 2012 article on Bultmann and Augustine, R. W. L. Moberly argued that the church should be understood as a “plausibility structure” for faith and thus a presupposition for the interpretation of Scripture. My response to him in 2014 addressed
Externí odkaz:
https://explore.openaire.eu/search/publication?articleId=doi_________::c1b55253c0324b5867daa755cba538f3
https://doi.org/10.5325/jtheointe.11.1.0101
https://doi.org/10.5325/jtheointe.11.1.0101
Autor:
David W. Congdon
Publikováno v:
Scottish Journal of Theology. 70:19-38
Ever since the 1920s, Rudolf Bultmann has been charged with confining theology to philosophy, owing to his naïve adoption of Martin Heidegger's existentialist ontology. Bultmann's personal friendship with Heidegger is well-known, and the presence of
Externí odkaz:
https://explore.openaire.eu/search/publication?articleId=doi_________::f3d6e9ba9f98267ae46f10d7cadd15bf
https://doi.org/10.1017/s0036930616000454
https://doi.org/10.1017/s0036930616000454
Autor:
John G. Flett, David W. Congdon
Building on the work and legacy of Darrell L. Guder, Converting Witness: The Future of Christian Mission in the New Millennium, explores key questions and new possibilities in missiology in light of the world Christian context. The conversation aroun
Autor:
David W. Congdon
Publikováno v:
Harvard Theological Review. 110:1-23
More than seventy years after Rudolf Bultmann delivered his famous lecture on the topic of “New Testament and Mythology” in 1941—initially on April 21 in Frankfurt am Main and again on June 4 in Alpirsbach—the program of demythologizing is st
Externí odkaz:
https://explore.openaire.eu/search/publication?articleId=doi_________::edff265030ce1f927b3ed50f221e7ca6
https://doi.org/10.1017/s0017816016000365
https://doi.org/10.1017/s0017816016000365
Autor:
David W. Congdon
Publikováno v:
Mission Studies. 33:127-146
This article introduces and assesses Sundermeier’s “hermeneutic of difference” (Differenzhermeneutik). Though he is not well-known in English-speaking circles, the pioneering work of Theo Sundermeier has contributed to a hermeneutical and inter
Externí odkaz:
https://explore.openaire.eu/search/publication?articleId=doi_________::eb889e6e8476e8f1bc6dc2cb08980b03
https://doi.org/10.1163/15733831-12341444
https://doi.org/10.1163/15733831-12341444