Zobrazeno 1 - 10
of 31
pro vyhledávání: '"David Godden"'
Publikováno v:
Informal Logic, Vol 43, Iss 2 (2023)
How is intellectual virtue related to critical thinking? Can one be a critical thinker without exercising intellectual virtue? Can one be intellectually virtuous without thereby being a critical thinker? How should our answers to these questions info
Externí odkaz:
https://doaj.org/article/9839a2ce75df4c70817346eefc96f7ab
Autor:
David Godden
Publikováno v:
Informal Logic, Vol 42, Iss 3 (2022)
On Gilbert’s multi-modal theory of argumentation, the “logical” is but one among many modes of argument, including the emotional, the visceral (physical), and the kisceral (intuitive). Yet, I argue that, properly understood, the logical is not
Externí odkaz:
https://doaj.org/article/4a8a14b73ba24b70a53688831938e645
Autor:
David Godden, Simon Wells
Publikováno v:
Informal Logic, Vol 42, Iss 1 (2022)
This paper considers the probative burdens of proposing action or policy options in deliberation dialogues. Do proposers bear a burden of proof? Building on pioneering work by Douglas Walton (2010), and following on a growing literature within comput
Externí odkaz:
https://doaj.org/article/2fa092562aa04eaf93540a4270254711
Autor:
David Godden
Publikováno v:
Languages, Vol 7, Iss 4, p 261 (2022)
On a Whatelian conception, a presumption is a “supposition … [that] must stand good until some sufficient reason is adduced against it.” This view may be understood as operationalizing a distinct quality of warrant for the acceptability of clai
Externí odkaz:
https://doaj.org/article/2803cc51f41642eb97e977afe33ccca6
Autor:
Philip Wilson, John Howie, Roger Strasser, David Godden, Lewis Ritchie, Frances Hines, Christopher Parker
Publikováno v:
Rural and Remote Health, Vol 20 (2020)
Externí odkaz:
https://doaj.org/article/7bfbbd1424c04f47b3b717571a3911e2
Autor:
David Godden
Publikováno v:
Informal Logic, Vol 35, Iss 2, Pp 135-166 (2015)
This paper explicates an account of argumentative rationality by articulating the common, basic idea of its nature, and then identifying a collection of assumptions inherent in it. Argumentative rationality is then contrasted with dual-process theori
Externí odkaz:
https://doaj.org/article/c01769deeb3147c68619bd46eac1bd8f
Autor:
David Godden, Frank Zenker
Publikováno v:
Informal Logic, Vol 35, Iss 1, Pp 88-134 (2015)
Recent work on conditional reasoning argues that denying the antecedent [DA] and affirming the consequent [AC] are defeasible but cogent patterns of argument, either because they are effective, rational, albeit heuristic applications of Bayesian prob
Externí odkaz:
https://doaj.org/article/bc10621a4113470790144634f8b69ebc
Autor:
David Godden
Publikováno v:
Informal Logic, Vol 34, Iss 1, Pp 124-151 (2014)
The paper reports on a Socratic exercise that introduces participants to the norm of rational entitlement, as distinct from political entitlement, and the attendant norm of rational responsibility. The exercise demonstrates that, because participants
Externí odkaz:
https://doaj.org/article/2acc516e6e84470a9e8c742aba0485fd
Autor:
David Godden, Douglas Walton
Publikováno v:
Informal Logic, Vol 27, Iss 3 (2008)
This paper begins a working through of Blair’s (2001) theoretical agenda concerning argumentation schemes and their attendant critical questions, in which we propose a number of solutions to some outstanding theoretical issues. We consider the clas
Externí odkaz:
https://doaj.org/article/82de74d98b30429cbcb66e6f376934d8
Autor:
David Godden, Douglas Walton
Publikováno v:
Informal Logic, Vol 28, Iss 1 (2008)
While defeasibility in legal reasoning has been the subject of recent scholarship, it has yet to be studied in the context of judicial opinion. Yet, being subject to appeal, judicial decisions can default for a variety of reasons. Prakken (2001) argu
Externí odkaz:
https://doaj.org/article/824b4023823c4378af14b1d16132b5aa