Zobrazeno 1 - 10
of 30
pro vyhledávání: '"David G Pina"'
Autor:
David G Pina
Publikováno v:
PLoS Computational Biology, Vol 20, Iss 8, p e1012335 (2024)
Externí odkaz:
https://doaj.org/article/c0534fef00134dc2b38fc482c5be16c9
Publikováno v:
F1000Research, Vol 10 (2021)
Background: We assessed the ethics review of proposals selected for funding under the Marie Skłodowska-Curie Actions (MSCA) and the European Research Council (ERC) in Horizon 2020, EU’s framework programme for research and innovation, 2014-2020. M
Externí odkaz:
https://doaj.org/article/d4ad8cc55f254374a8b772b18e5943f8
Publikováno v:
F1000Research, Vol 10 (2021)
Background: We assessed the ethics review of proposals selected for funding under the Marie Skłodowska-Curie Actions (MSCA) and the European Research Council (ERC) in Horizon 2020, EU’s framework programme for research and innovation, 2014-2020. M
Externí odkaz:
https://doaj.org/article/ff3b08fc39144a38a14621323673e9e6
Publikováno v:
eLife, Vol 10 (2021)
Most funding agencies rely on peer review to evaluate grant applications and proposals, but research into the use of this process by funding agencies has been limited. Here we explore if two changes to the organization of peer review for proposals su
Externí odkaz:
https://doaj.org/article/728ec30c13804eac99a0d4999d26f8d6
Publikováno v:
PLoS ONE, Vol 14, Iss 2, p e0212286 (2019)
Assessing the success and performance of researchers is a difficult task, as their grant output is influenced by a series of factors, including seniority, gender and geographical location of their host institution. In order to assess the effects of t
Externí odkaz:
https://doaj.org/article/0fca50a784064438baed2662ca354af2
Publikováno v:
PLoS ONE, Vol 10, Iss 6, p e0130753 (2015)
We analysed the peer review of grant proposals under Marie Curie Actions, a major EU research funding instrument, which involves two steps: an independent assessment (Individual Evaluation Report, IER) performed remotely by 3 raters, and a consensus
Externí odkaz:
https://doaj.org/article/e08b3ad08c994839a76e7f8978a48263
Publikováno v:
Technological Forecasting and Social Change
Research often fails to be translated into applications because of lack of financial support. The Proof of Concept (PoC) funding scheme from the European Research Council (ERC) supports the early stages of the valorization process of the research con
Externí odkaz:
https://explore.openaire.eu/search/publication?articleId=doi_dedup___::a9517f6139e5d66d036bda36f4f6745c
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2022.122009
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2022.122009
Publikováno v:
eLife
eLife, Vol 10 (2021)
eLife, Vol 10 (2021)
Most funding agencies rely on peer review to evaluate grant applications and proposals, but research into the use of this process by funding agencies has been limited. Here we explore if two changes to the organization of peer review for proposals su
Externí odkaz:
https://explore.openaire.eu/search/publication?articleId=doi_dedup___::ef3367dd74a4a00fc6f1c3f6cdf6367d
http://europepmc.org/articles/PMC7806263
http://europepmc.org/articles/PMC7806263
Publikováno v:
Research Evaluation
We have limited understanding of why reviewers tend to strongly disagree when scoring the same research proposal. Thus far, research that explored disagreement has focused on the characteristics of the proposal or the applicants, while ignoring the c
Externí odkaz:
https://explore.openaire.eu/search/publication?articleId=doi_dedup___::a1e8e8298d704de5718be135e182e1ed
https://hdl.handle.net/11250/2989662
https://hdl.handle.net/11250/2989662
