Zobrazeno 1 - 10
of 95
pro vyhledávání: '"David Estlund"'
Autor:
David Estlund
Democracy is not naturally plausible. Why turn such important matters over to masses of people who have no expertise? Many theories of democracy answer by appealing to the intrinsic value of democratic procedure, leaving aside whether it makes good d
Autor:
David Estlund
Publikováno v:
Jerusalem Review of Legal Studies. 25:84-95
Externí odkaz:
https://explore.openaire.eu/search/publication?articleId=doi_________::463a9beb1e7faf7fae28a71f93196fa3
https://doi.org/10.1093/jrls/jlac006
https://doi.org/10.1093/jrls/jlac006
Autor:
David Estlund
Publikováno v:
Philosophical Studies. 178:2439-2472
I offer replies to critical comments on my book, Utopophobia: On the Limits (If Any) of Political Philosophy, in four pieces appearing in the same issue of this journal.
Externí odkaz:
https://explore.openaire.eu/search/publication?articleId=doi_________::60415d2142ee9b51a8838341160180df
https://doi.org/10.1007/s11098-020-01534-8
https://doi.org/10.1007/s11098-020-01534-8
Autor:
David Estlund
Publikováno v:
Philosophical Studies. 178:2359-2364
Externí odkaz:
https://explore.openaire.eu/search/publication?articleId=doi_________::125711476951e9b81738bfe45246a58a
https://doi.org/10.1007/s11098-020-01529-5
https://doi.org/10.1007/s11098-020-01529-5
Autor:
David Estlund
Publikováno v:
Utopophobia
This chapter deals with plural obligation. Here, the idea of Prime Requirement, upon which the idea of Prime Justice depends, is committed to there being such a thing as a moral requirement of some kind over multiple agents even where they are not a
Externí odkaz:
https://explore.openaire.eu/search/publication?articleId=doi_________::f694817d880bca8336c16d5adafd3102
https://doi.org/10.23943/princeton/9780691147161.003.0011
https://doi.org/10.23943/princeton/9780691147161.003.0011
Autor:
David Estlund
Publikováno v:
Utopophobia
This chapter discusses the fallacy of approximation. When political theory constructs models that are idealized in certain ways, it is natural to ask whether they are of any use in practice. If there is hope of fully achieving them, then they might s
Externí odkaz:
https://explore.openaire.eu/search/publication?articleId=doi_________::4919737d53ed8ca56f29bd07e99e72ab
https://doi.org/10.23943/princeton/9780691147161.003.0014
https://doi.org/10.23943/princeton/9780691147161.003.0014
Autor:
David Estlund
This concluding chapter pulls some of the book's main threads together in order to frame their significance, and to make several further observations. The relation presented in this book between idealistic theory and real political practice is mixed:
Externí odkaz:
https://explore.openaire.eu/search/publication?articleId=doi_________::41cc32bdfcb3f300ffa595233e6dc6af
https://doi.org/10.23943/princeton/9780691147161.003.0018
https://doi.org/10.23943/princeton/9780691147161.003.0018
Autor:
David Estlund
Publikováno v:
Utopophobia
This chapter considers several ways in which idealistic theories of justice could have value for practice. There are two main points in the chapter. First, it is important not to foreclose the possibility of unbelievable moral progress. Second, even
Externí odkaz:
https://explore.openaire.eu/search/publication?articleId=doi_________::a8122e0996b9e63a47861df94fd6b31d
https://doi.org/10.23943/princeton/9780691147161.003.0013
https://doi.org/10.23943/princeton/9780691147161.003.0013
Autor:
David Estlund
Throughout the history of political philosophy and politics, there has been continual debate about the roles of idealism versus realism. For contemporary political philosophy, this debate manifests in notions of ideal theory versus nonideal theory. N
Externí odkaz:
https://explore.openaire.eu/search/publication?articleId=doi_dedup___::31a42c21fc1c2a48a89b0d7dd286071f
https://doi.org/10.23943/princeton/9780691147161.001.0001
https://doi.org/10.23943/princeton/9780691147161.001.0001
Autor:
David Estlund
Publikováno v:
Utopophobia
This chapter turns to the supposedly anti-idealistic implications of the “circumstances of justice” as understood especially in Hume and Rawls. David Hume influentially argued that humans would never have developed the idea of justice at all if i
Externí odkaz:
https://explore.openaire.eu/search/publication?articleId=doi_________::ddb53a5babeaa4bc5ccc3a5fd46cee90
https://doi.org/10.23943/princeton/9780691147161.003.0004
https://doi.org/10.23943/princeton/9780691147161.003.0004