Zobrazeno 1 - 10
of 38
pro vyhledávání: '"David A. Martindale"'
Autor:
David A. Martindale
Publikováno v:
Family Court Review. 61:62-64
Externí odkaz:
https://explore.openaire.eu/search/publication?articleId=doi_________::1046462858bd6b9653ebbb5c0d61c8cd
https://doi.org/10.1111/fcre.12695
https://doi.org/10.1111/fcre.12695
Autor:
Randy K. Otto, David A. Martindale
Publikováno v:
Expert Psychological Testimony for the Courts ISBN: 9781003064404
Custody is contested in only a minority of divorce proceedings involving children, and mental health professionals conduct evaluations of parents and children in only a small subset of these contested cases. After a brief overview of child custody la
Externí odkaz:
https://explore.openaire.eu/search/publication?articleId=doi_________::cec86aa168eafc8963a7ea7b7e062a2e
https://doi.org/10.4324/9781003064404-11
https://doi.org/10.4324/9781003064404-11
Autor:
David A. Martindale
Publikováno v:
Journal of Child Custody. 10:141-153
The vast majority of mental health practitioners who are currently performing evaluations in litigated custody disputes were initially educated and trained as treatment providers. Some of what they learned serves them well as they endeavor to evaluat
Externí odkaz:
https://explore.openaire.eu/search/publication?articleId=doi_________::8e5c735bd843c8c783ee92f5027a2fa9
https://doi.org/10.1080/15379418.2013.796852
https://doi.org/10.1080/15379418.2013.796852
Autor:
Timothy M. Tippins, Yossef S. Ben-Porath, William G. Austin, Jeffrey P. Wittmann, David A. Martindale
Publikováno v:
Family Court Review. 50:502-507
In July, 2011, the Family Court Review published an article by Ackerman and Pritzl that purported to provide new data reflecting the current practices of custody evaluators. Regrettably, as a result of flawed methodology and a deficient legal analysi
Externí odkaz:
https://explore.openaire.eu/search/publication?articleId=doi_________::d30eafe2394d88a5553975cf7e6a241a
https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1744-1617.2012.01466.x
https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1744-1617.2012.01466.x
Publikováno v:
Journal of Child Custody. 8:32-46
While the roles of trial consultant and testifying expert witness share many functions, the field of forensic psychology has evolved and it appears that, among those who offer these services regularly, there is a developing consensus that keeping the
Externí odkaz:
https://explore.openaire.eu/search/publication?articleId=doi_________::a876572f9a2deb353c90aa37c49fad4d
https://doi.org/10.1080/15379418.2010.547442
https://doi.org/10.1080/15379418.2010.547442
Autor:
James N. Bow, David A. Martindale
Publikováno v:
Journal of Forensic Psychology Practice. 9:127-137
This study explored how psychologists developed and managed a child custody practice. A national sample of 138 psychologists obtained from public access referral sites and a child custody listserv responded to the survey, with a total sample response
Externí odkaz:
https://explore.openaire.eu/search/publication?articleId=doi_________::c6e320e7325d5a6abc75243f1563fc0b
https://doi.org/10.1080/15228930802575482
https://doi.org/10.1080/15228930802575482
Autor:
Jonathan W. Gould, David A. Martindale
Publikováno v:
Journal of Child Custody. 5:217-227
Forensic psychologists in general, and child custody evaluators, in particular, who submit reports to courts in disputed custodial placement and access cases should respect the requirement of Federal Rule of Evidence 702 that expert testimony be “b
Externí odkaz:
https://explore.openaire.eu/search/publication?articleId=doi_________::ba7d1e3faa1636d27bdf2b7b75f402ce
https://doi.org/10.1080/15379410802583700
https://doi.org/10.1080/15379410802583700
Autor:
Jonathan W. Gould, David A. Martindale
Publikováno v:
Journal of Child Custody. 4:69-75
Responding to Daniel Pickar's article entitled “Counter-transference Bias in the Child Custody Evaluator” (this issue), the authors opine that attaching new labels to familiar dynamics fails to contribute to an understanding of interpersonal dyna
Externí odkaz:
https://explore.openaire.eu/search/publication?articleId=doi_________::a47f725676ef3f3c65ae1b7db82613a1
https://doi.org/10.1300/j190v04n03_05
https://doi.org/10.1300/j190v04n03_05
Publikováno v:
Journal of Child Custody. 4:1-35
Allegations of domestic violence are among the most difficult to assess when they are posed during a child custody evaluation. We discuss the social and political context within which such evaluations occur. We describe both historical and current co
Externí odkaz:
https://explore.openaire.eu/search/publication?articleId=doi_________::f307b6f383fb43ccd070a6d6cdae63d3
https://doi.org/10.1300/j190v04n01_01
https://doi.org/10.1300/j190v04n01_01
Publikováno v:
Journal of Forensic Psychology Practice. 7:111-124
A primary responsibility of child custody evaluators is to investigate areas of concern relevant to the issues before the court and areas of concern raised by attorneys and their clients. In this commentary, we discuss the need for evaluators to disc
Externí odkaz:
https://explore.openaire.eu/search/publication?articleId=doi_________::6ec698f4206c5308c1e8c32254c7cb9e
https://doi.org/10.1300/j158v07n04_04
https://doi.org/10.1300/j158v07n04_04