Zobrazeno 1 - 10
of 79
pro vyhledávání: '"Daniele Fanelli"'
Publikováno v:
BMJ Open, Vol 13, Iss 8 (2023)
Objectives This descriptive study of registered trials aimed to identify large clinical trials on antidepressants for mental disorders: (1) to assess what proportion could be labelled as ‘seeding trials’ (trials for marketing purposes) and (2) to
Externí odkaz:
https://doaj.org/article/f5d7e6764d264eddbb3558d28a7836b3
Publikováno v:
PLoS ONE, Vol 17, Iss 3, p e0255334 (2022)
Pressures to publish, perverse incentives, financial interest and gender are amongst the most commonly discussed risk factors for scientific misconduct. However, evidence of their association with actual data fabrication and falsification is inconclu
Externí odkaz:
https://doaj.org/article/1a3faa0d2f414321be239ecf64778664
Publikováno v:
PLoS ONE, Vol 15, Iss 9 (2020)
Introduction During the Covid-19 pandemic, major journals have published a significant number of Covid-19 related articles in a short period of time. While this is necessary to combat the worldwide pandemic, it may have trade-offs with respect to pub
Externí odkaz:
https://doaj.org/article/eac48ae2001a4db892beca8e8e735303
Autor:
Daniele Fanelli
Publikováno v:
Royal Society Open Science, Vol 6, Iss 4 (2019)
This article proposes quantitative answers to meta-scientific questions including ‘how much knowledge is attained by a research field?’, ‘how rapidly is a field making progress?’, ‘what is the expected reproducibility of a result?’, ‘ho
Externí odkaz:
https://doaj.org/article/523fff0ac0384d0fb058c7a99ec85dd9
Autor:
Daniele Fanelli, Vincent Larivière
Publikováno v:
PLoS ONE, Vol 11, Iss 3, p e0149504 (2016)
Debates over the pros and cons of a "publish or perish" philosophy have inflamed academia for at least half a century. Growing concerns, in particular, are expressed for policies that reward "quantity" at the expense of "quality," because these might
Externí odkaz:
https://doaj.org/article/506cd3b439f94c54b2b37d11684d621b
Publikováno v:
PLoS ONE, Vol 11, Iss 2, p e0149590 (2016)
Publication bias leads consumers of research to observe a selected sample of statistical estimates calculated by producers of research. We calculate critical values for statistical significance that could help to adjust after the fact for the distort
Externí odkaz:
https://doaj.org/article/0b76a86c9aad406ea15f5c612b006962
Publikováno v:
PLoS Biology, Vol 13, Iss 10, p e1002264 (2015)
As the scientific enterprise has grown in size and diversity, we need empirical evidence on the research process to test and apply interventions that make it more efficient and its results more reliable. Meta-research is an evolving scientific discip
Externí odkaz:
https://doaj.org/article/6387ade45a2b449db27a18b9f27f392f
Publikováno v:
PLoS ONE, Vol 10, Iss 6, p e0127556 (2015)
The honesty and integrity of scientists is widely believed to be threatened by pressures to publish, unsupportive research environments, and other structural, sociological and psychological factors. Belief in the importance of these factors has inspi
Externí odkaz:
https://doaj.org/article/50ad0192086a4b7e8c2b183222074f0c
Autor:
Daniele Fanelli
Publikováno v:
PLoS Medicine, Vol 10, Iss 12, p e1001563 (2013)
Externí odkaz:
https://doaj.org/article/e7d5178723204d3d8958ea82509059a0
Autor:
Daniele Fanelli, Wolfgang Glänzel
Publikováno v:
PLoS ONE, Vol 8, Iss 6, p e66938 (2013)
The hypothesis of a Hierarchy of the Sciences, first formulated in the 19(th) century, predicts that, moving from simple and general phenomena (e.g. particle dynamics) to complex and particular (e.g. human behaviour), researchers lose ability to reac
Externí odkaz:
https://doaj.org/article/3d4f908ac63948dfbfff88894e60830e