Tento výsledek nelze pro nepřihlášené uživatele zobrazit.
K zobrazení výsledku je třeba se přihlásit.

Innovation Strategies of Three of the BRICS: Brazil, India and China - What can we learn from Three Different Approaches?

Autor: Dahlman, C

Innovation in developing countries should not be defined just in terms of shifting global frontier technology but in terms what is new to the country. Innovation strategy should include policies and mechanisms that affect a country’s ability to dra

Externí odkaz: https://explore.openaire.eu/search/publication?articleId=od______1064::a27dc8960df204c88a6a88ce66fa9499
https://ora.ox.ac.uk/objects/uuid:4c2d156d-c8e1-40b5-ae9a-33decf789f8b

Argumentation from reasonableness in the justification of judicial decisions

Autor: Feteris, E.T., Bustamante, T., Dahlman, C.

Publikováno v: Argument Types and Fallacies in Legal Argumentation ISBN: 9783319161471
Argument Types and Fallacies in Legal Argumentation, 179-201
STARTPAGE=179;ENDPAGE=201;TITLE=Argument Types and Fallacies in Legal Argumentation

In legal decision-making reasonableness plays an important role. In the literature, generally speaking, there is a consensus that reasonableness as a norm for judges in the application of law implies that they take into account a combination of diffe

Externí odkaz: https://explore.openaire.eu/search/publication?articleId=doi_dedup___::37c6229d7de4c2db45d6fd1d32a84b03
https://dare.uva.nl/personal/pure/en/publications/argumentation-from-reasonableness-in-the-justification-of-judicial-decisions(adfe6b00-54d0-471e-808a-277621924129).html

Construction or reconstruction? On the function of argumentation in the law: On the function of argumentation in the law

Autor: Hage, J.C., Dahlman, C., Feteris, Eveline

Publikováno v: Legal argumentation theory: cross-disciplinary perspectives, 125-144
ISSUE=1;STARTPAGE=125;ENDPAGE=144;TITLE=Legal argumentation theory

This paper discusses the viability of legal constructivism, the view that the legal consequences of a case are what the best legal argument says they are. Legal constructivism is opposed to reconstructivism, the view that legal arguments merely aim a

Externí odkaz: https://explore.openaire.eu/search/publication?articleId=narcis______::1ed9fe65caea55d8d2d8667b58a3132e
https://cris.maastrichtuniversity.nl/en/publications/3855967b-c287-44b0-896a-0e2af289ef02

Arguments from unacceptable consequences in the justification of judicial opinions

Autor: Feteris, E.T., Dahlman, C., Krawietz, W.

Publikováno v: Values, rights and duties in legal and philosophical discourse., 225-237
STARTPAGE=225;ENDPAGE=237;TITLE=Values, rights and duties in legal and philosophical discourse.

Externí odkaz: https://explore.openaire.eu/search/publication?articleId=narcis______::30d46b1873c8d282fa49b105e46490f3
https://dare.uva.nl/personal/pure/en/publications/arguments-from-unacceptable-consequences-in-the-justification-of-judicial-opinions(f8a6b54e-36d9-40a8-855b-391cabfd73da).html