Zobrazeno 1 - 10
of 21
pro vyhledávání: '"D. J. S. Cross"'
With inspiration from the non-violence resistance movements of Mahatma Gandhi, Nelson Mandela and Martin Luther King Jr., Crépon reveals how philosophy and literature, using courage and a new language, can overcome the many forms of hatred and viole
Autor:
D. J. S. Cross
D. J. S. Cross argues that Deleuze's ambivalence towards affect and embodiment have been overlooked because they only become apparent through a systematic analysis of affect throughout Deleuze's work. Cross outlines how Deleuze's system of thought bo
Publikováno v:
Epoché: A Journal for the History of Philosophy. 24:467-483
This essay situates “singularity” at the heart of the power dynamics operative in contemporary pedagogy and the system supporting it. More than merely academic learning, indeed, “school” here denotes not only the range of disciplinary authori
Externí odkaz:
https://explore.openaire.eu/search/publication?articleId=doi_________::1abcf9a299afa53616d0eab94e3e9c81
https://doi.org/10.5840/epoche202034165
https://doi.org/10.5840/epoche202034165
Autor:
D. J. S. Cross, Eric Pommier
Publikováno v:
Philosophy Today. 64:185-203
Jan Patočka holds that both the Husserlian and the Heideggerian descriptions of history remain abstract because they lack an authentic reflection on historical sense’s appearing, which presupposes a description of the transition from the nonhistor
Externí odkaz:
https://explore.openaire.eu/search/publication?articleId=doi_________::d36e230f053b7e9c94470d4957cef4d0
https://doi.org/10.5840/philtoday2020410327
https://doi.org/10.5840/philtoday2020410327
Autor:
D. J. S. Cross
Chapter 2 addresses Deleuze’s complex inheritance of David Hume’s concept of ‘contemplation’. In general, the concept gives Deleuze the resources to argue that sensibility is more originary than the idea of the ‘self’. Accordingly, Deleuz
Externí odkaz:
https://explore.openaire.eu/search/publication?articleId=doi_________::696001a3dfb8ee9780c56982196180e4
https://doi.org/10.3366/edinburgh/9781474485548.003.0003
https://doi.org/10.3366/edinburgh/9781474485548.003.0003
Autor:
D. J. S. Cross
Chapter 6 addresses affect in Deleuze’s final encounter with the Spinozist system in ‘Spinoza and the Three “Ethics”’. In the ‘Three “Ethics”’, his most refined reading of Spinoza’s system, Deleuze associates ‘affects’ with wh
Externí odkaz:
https://explore.openaire.eu/search/publication?articleId=doi_________::3af4557d445afa356538239eefdbe510
https://doi.org/10.3366/edinburgh/9781474485548.003.0007
https://doi.org/10.3366/edinburgh/9781474485548.003.0007
Autor:
D. J. S. Cross
Rather reiterate my argument, I conclude by confirming Deleuze’s ambivalence in Logic of Sense and Anti-Oedipus. I argue that, although Deleuze himself announces a ‘rupture’ between these two works, the problem of affect remains consistent desp
Externí odkaz:
https://explore.openaire.eu/search/publication?articleId=doi_________::85c3c27eb3bccf1e84ad4c9d88e32972
https://doi.org/10.3366/edinburgh/9781474485548.003.0008
https://doi.org/10.3366/edinburgh/9781474485548.003.0008
Autor:
D. J. S. Cross
While commentators regularly underappreciate or outright dismiss it, the doctrine of faculties in Difference and Repetition is indispensable to Deleuze’s philosophy of difference because, according to Deleuze, the philosopher must grasp difference
Externí odkaz:
https://explore.openaire.eu/search/publication?articleId=doi_________::a008cd7b8399985e9617602a764a5bd0
https://doi.org/10.3366/edinburgh/9781474485548.003.0002
https://doi.org/10.3366/edinburgh/9781474485548.003.0002
Autor:
D. J. S. Cross
The Introduction serves several distinct but interrelated purposes. First, it clarifies my terminology vis-à-vis Deleuze. Second, it articulates the general argument that guides the book at large. Namely, Deleuze’s most radical deployments of affe
Externí odkaz:
https://explore.openaire.eu/search/publication?articleId=doi_________::f2cfc335d358aebdf07276288a9c2d21
https://doi.org/10.3366/edinburgh/9781474485548.003.0001
https://doi.org/10.3366/edinburgh/9781474485548.003.0001
Autor:
D. J. S. Cross
Chapter 5 specifies the precise but silent moment in which Deleuze breaks with Spinoza. For Spinoza, affectus refers to an individual’s passage or (in Deleuze’s terms) ‘becoming’ between two states. Deleuze generalises and radicalises this id
Externí odkaz:
https://explore.openaire.eu/search/publication?articleId=doi_________::f09c74aaa7b1aeaf928c03670cf48345
https://doi.org/10.3366/edinburgh/9781474485548.003.0006
https://doi.org/10.3366/edinburgh/9781474485548.003.0006