Zobrazeno 1 - 10
of 23
pro vyhledávání: '"Cuencas urbanas"'
Autor:
Tomas Rodriguez, Juan Sanchez
Publikováno v:
Cuadernos del CURIHAM, Vol 24 (2018)
La falta de datos confiables y precisos es uno de los principales obstáculos para la correcta aplicación de tecnologías apropiadas en los modernos sistemas de drenaje urbano. Particularmente, la provincia de Misiones presenta un marcado déficit d
Externí odkaz:
https://doaj.org/article/48c71d8b3f78477689e15fc7b8199511
Publikováno v:
Labor & Engenho, Vol 11, Iss 1 (2017)
RESUMEN: Este artículo propone un modelo para el ordenamiento del territorio urbano, basado en el criterio de cuencas urbanas como las unidades de planificación para la sostenibilidad territorial como una visión alternativa, a la propuesta actual
Externí odkaz:
https://doaj.org/article/786c9a85d6124ef2b286d0492fbe11dd
En el presente proyecto de grado, se genera el análisis del costo beneficio de la implementación de los Sistemas Urbanos de Drenaje Sostenible (Conocidos como SUDS), en una ciudadela compuesta por diez urbanizaciones en tres diferentes estratos (un
Externí odkaz:
https://explore.openaire.eu/search/publication?articleId=od______9507::ff94858769bbaf554d7b232242a45b5b
https://catalogo.escuelaing.edu.co/cgi-bin/koha/opac-detail.pl?biblionumber=22288
https://catalogo.escuelaing.edu.co/cgi-bin/koha/opac-detail.pl?biblionumber=22288
Autor:
Hugo Romero, Alexis Vásquez
Publikováno v:
EURE (Santiago) - Revista Latinoamericana de Estudios Urbano Regionales, Vol 31, Iss 94, Pp 97-117 (2005)
Las cuencas son complejos sistemas ambientales en que se desarrollan procesos geomorfológicos, hidrológicos, climáticos y ecológicos, que son impactados por la urbanización. En este trabajo se estudian seis cuencas del piedemonte andino de la ci
Externí odkaz:
https://doaj.org/article/2defac1a2b2f49618911eba807824bd7
Publikováno v:
Land
Volume 10
Issue 1
Nowak, D.J.; Dwyer, J.F. Understanding the benefits and costs of urban forest ecosystems. In Urban and Community Forestry in the Northeast; Springer: Dordrecht, The Netherlands, 2007; pp. 25–46.
Valente, D.; Pasimeni, M.R.; Petrosillo, I. The role of green infrastructures in Italian cities by linking natural and social capital. Ecol. Indic. 2020, 108, 105694. [
Haase, D.; Larondelle, N.; Andersson, E.; Artmann, M.; Borgström, S.; Breuste, J.; Gomez-Baggethun, E.; Gren, Å.; Hamstead, Z.; Hansen, R.; et al. A quantitative review of urban ecosystem service assessments: Concepts, models, and implementation. Ambio 2014, 43, 413–433
Escobedo, F.J.; Kroeger, T.; Wagner, J.E. Urban forests and pollution mitigation: Analyzing ecosystem services and disservices. Environ. Pollut. 2011, 159, 2078–2087
Lyytimäki, J.; Petersen, L.K.; Normander, B.; Bezák, P. Nature as a nuisance? Ecosystem services and disservices to urban lifestyle. Environ. Sci. 2008, 5, 161–172.
Soto, J.R.; Escobedo, F.J.; Khachatryan, H.; Adams, D.C. Consumer demand for urban forest ecosystem services and disservices: Examining trade-offs using choice experiments and best-worst scaling. Ecosyst. Serv. 2018, 29, 31–39.
Andersson, E.; Barthel, S.; Ahrné, K. Measuring social–Ecological dynamics behind the generation of ecosystem services. Ecol. Appl. 2007, 17, 1267–1278.
Ernstson, H.; Barthel, S.; Andersson, E.; Borgström, S.T. Scale-crossing brokers and network governance of urban ecosystem services: The case of stockholm. Ecol. Soc. 2010, 15, 28.
Kabisch, N. Ecosystem service implementation and governance challenges in urban green space planning—The case of Berlin, Germany. Land Use Policy 2015, 42, 557–567.
Lyytimäki, J.; Sipilä, M. Hopping on one leg–The challenge of ecosystem disservices for urban green management. Urban For. Urban Green. 2009, 8, 309–315.
Andersson, E.; McPhearson, T.; Kremer, P.; Gomez-Baggethun, E.; Haase, D.; Tuvendal, M.; Wurster, D. Scale and context dependence of ecosystem service providing units. Ecosyst. Serv. 2015, 12, 157–164.
Haase, D.; Frantzeskaki, N.; Elmqvist, T. Ecosystem Services in Urban Landscapes: Practical Applications and Governance Implications. Ambio 2014, 43, 407–412.
Balooni, K.; Gangopadhyay, K.; Kumar, B.M. Governance for private green spaces in a growing Indian city. Landsc. Urban Plan. 2014, 123, 21–29.
Daw, T.M.; Brown, K.; Rosendo, S.; Pomeroy, R. Applying the ecosystem services concept to poverty alleviation: The need to disaggregate human well-being. Environ. Conserv. 2011, 38, 370–379.
Scopelliti, M.; Carrus, G.; Adinolfi, C.; Suárez-Cáceres, G.; Colangelo, G.; Lafortezza, R.; Panno, A.; Sanesi, G. Staying in touch with nature and well-being in different income groups: The experience of urban parks in Bogotá. Landsc. Urban Plan. 2016, 148, 139–148.
Pascual, U.; Balvanera, P.; Díaz, S.; Pataki, G.; Roth, E.; Stenseke, M.; Watson, R.T.; Dessane, E.B.; Islar, M.; Kelemen, E.; et al. Valuing nature’s contributions to people: The IPBES approach. Curr. Opin. Environ. Sustain. 2017, 26–27, 7–16.
Escobedo, F.J.; Giannico, V.; Jim, C.Y.; Sanesi, G.; Lafortezza, R. Urban forests, ecosystem services, green infrastructure and nature-based solutions: Nexus or evolving metaphors? Urban For. Urban Green. 2019, 37, 3–12.
Dıaz, S.; Pascual, U.M.; Stenseke, B.; Martın-López, R.T.; Watson, Z.; Molnár, R.; Hill, K.M.; Chan, I.A.; Baste, K.A.; Brauman, S.; et al. Assessing nature’s contributions to people: Recognizing culture, and diverse sources of knowledge, can improve assessments. Science 2018, 359, 270–272.
Carriazo, F. Arborización y crimen urbano en Bogotá. IDEAS. 2017. Documentos CEDE 015286, Universidad de los Andes-CEDE. Available
Dobbs, C.; Escobedo, F.J.; Clerici, N.; De La Barrera, F.; Eleuterio, A.A.; MacGregor-Fors, I.; Reyes-Paecke, S.; Vásquez, A.; Camaño, J.D.Z.; Hernández, H.J. Urban ecosystem Services in Latin America: Mismatch between global concepts and regional realities? Urban Ecosyst. 2019, 22, 173–187.
Chaudhry, P.; Singh, B.; Tewari, V.P. Non-market economic valuation in developing countries: Role of participant observation method in CVM analysis. J. For. Econ. 2007, 13, 259–275.
Kenward, R.E.; Whittingham, M.J.; Arampatzis, S.; Manos, B.D.; Hahn, T.; Terry, A.; Simoncini, R.; Alcorn, J.; Bastian, O.; Donlan, M.; et al. Identifying governance strategies that effectively support ecosystem services, resource sustainability, and biodiversity. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2011, 108, 5308–5312.
Kreye, M.M.; Adams, D.C.; Escobedo, F.J.; Soto, J.R. Does policy process influence public values for forest-water resource protection in Florida? Ecol. Econ. 2016, 129, 122–131.
Huang, C.-W.; McDonald, R.I.; Seto, K.C. The importance of land governance for biodiversity conservation in an era of global urban expansion. Landsc. Urban Plan. 2018, 173, 44–50.
Perkins, H.A. Out from the (Green) shadow? Neoliberal hegemony through the market logic of shared urban environmental governance. Politi Geogr. 2009, 28, 395–405.
Turnhout, E.; Neves, K.; De Lijster, E. ‘Measurementality’ in Biodiversity Governance: Knowledge, Transparency, and the Intergovernmental Science-Policy Platform on Biodiversity and Ecosystem Services (Ipbes). Environ. Plan. A Econ. Space 2014, 46, 581–597.
Bell, S.; Hindmoor, A. Governance without government? The case of the forest stewardship council. Public Adm. 2011, 90, 144–159.
Lawrence, A.; De Vreese, R.; Johnston, M.; Bosch, C.C.K.V.D.; Sanesi, G. Urban forest governance: Towards a framework for comparing approaches. Urban For. Urban Green. 2013, 12, 464–473.
Connolly, J.J.; Svendsen, E.S.; Fisher, D.R.; Campbell, L.K. Organizing urban ecosystem services through environmental stewardship governance in New York City. Landsc. Urban Plan. 2013, 109, 76–84.
Van Den Bosch, C.C.K.; Rodbell, P.; Salbitano, F.; Sayers, K.; Villarpando, S.J.; Yokohari, M. The changing governance of urban forests. Unasylva 2018, 69, 37–42.
Launay-Gama, C.; Pachón, M. Prácticas de evaluación de la gobernanza en América Latina; Universidad de Los Andes: Bogotá, Colombia, 2011
Atmi¸s, E.; Batuhan Gün¸sen, H.; Yüceda ˘g, C.; Lise, W. Factors affecting the use of urban forests in Turkey. Turk. J. For. 2017, 18, 1–10.
Shackleton, R.T.; Angelstam, P.; Van Der Waal, B.; Elbakidze, M. Progress made in managing and valuing ecosystem services: A horizon scan of gaps in research, management and governance. Ecosyst. Serv. 2017, 27, 232–241.
Lockwood, M. Good governance for terrestrial protected areas: A framework, principles and performance outcomes. J. Environ. Manag. 2010, 91, 754–766.
Barrett, C.; Gibson, C.; Hoffman, B.; Mccubbins, M. The complex links between governance and biodiversity. Conserv. Biol. 2006, 20, 1358–1366.
Falk, T.; Spangenberg, J.H.; Siegmund-Schultze, M.; Kobbe, S.; Feike, T.; Kuebler, D.; Settele, J.; Vorlaufer, T. Identifying governance challenges in ecosystem services management—Conceptual considerations and comparison of global forest cases. Ecosyst. Serv. 2018, 32, 193–203
Piña, W.H.A.; Martínez, C.I.P. Urban material flow analysis: An approach for Bogotá, Colombia. Ecol. Indic. 2014, 42, 32–42.
Escobedo, F.J.; Clerici, N.; Staudhammer, C.L.; Corzo, G.T. Socio-ecological dynamics and inequality in Bogotá, Colombia’s public urban forests and their ecosystem services. Urban For. Urban Green. 2015, 14, 1040–1053.
Meza, C.A. Crossroads and Conflict. Urbanization, Conservation and Rurality in the Eastern Mountains of Bogotá. Rev. Colomb. Antropol. 2008, 44, 439–480.
Escobedo, F.J.; Clerici, N.; Staudhammer, C.L.; Feged-Rivadeneira, A.; Bohorquez, J.C.; Tovar, G. Trees and Crime in Bogota, Colombia: Is the link an ecosystem disservice or service? Land Use Policy 2018, 78, 583–592.
Wurster, D.; Artmann, M. Development of a Concept for Non-monetary Assessment of Urban Ecosystem Services at the Site Level. Ambio 2014, 43, 454–465.
Martín-López, B.; Iniesta-Arandia, I.; García-Llorente, M.; Palomo, I.; Casado-Arzuaga, I.; Del Amo, D.G.; Gómez-Baggethun, E.; Oteros-Rozas, E.; Palacios-Agundez, I.; Willaarts, B.; et al. Uncovering Ecosystem Service Bundles through Social Preferences. PLoS ONE 2012, 7, e38970.
Dobbs, C.; Hernández-Moreno, Á.; Reyes-Paecke, S.; Miranda, M.D. Exploring temporal dynamics of urban ecosystem services in Latin America: The case of Bogota (Colombia) and Santiago (Chile). Ecol. Indic. 2018, 85, 1068–1080.
Agbenyega, O.; Burgess, P.J.; Cook, M.; Morris, J. Application of an ecosystem function framework to perceptions of community woodlands. Land Use Policy 2009, 26, 551–557
Ricaurte, L.F.; Olaya-Rodríguez, M.H.; Cepeda-Valencia, J.; Lara, D.; Arroyave-Suárez, J.; Finlayson, C.M.; Palomo, I. Future impacts of drivers of change on wetland ecosystem services in Colombia. Glob. Environ. Chang. 2017, 44, 158–169.
Hartter, J.; Goldman, A. Local responses to a forest park in western Uganda: Alternate narratives on fortress conservation. Oryx 2010, 45, 60–68.
Allendorf, T.D.; Yang, J. The role of ecosystem services in park–people relationships: The case of Gaoligongshan Nature Reserve in southwest China. Biol. Conserv. 2013, 167, 187–193.
García-Suaza, A.F.; Guataquí, J.C.; Guerra, J.A.; Maldonado, D. Beyond the Mincer equation: The internal rate of return to higher education in Colombia. Educ Econ. 2014, 22, 328–344.
Kadykalo, A.N.; López-Rodriguez, M.D.; Ainscough, J.; Droste, N.; Ryu, H.; Ávila-Flores, G.; Le Clec’H, S.; Muñoz, M.C.; Nilsson, L.; Rana, S.; et al. Disentangling ‘ecosystem services’ and ‘nature’s contributions to people’. Ecosyst. People 2019, 15, 269–287.
Acey, C. Managing wickedness in the Niger Delta: Can a new approach to multi-stakeholder governance increase voice and sustainability? Landsc. Urban Plan. 2016, 154, 102–114
Sarkki, S. Governance services: Co-producing human well-being with ecosystem services. Ecosyst. Serv. 2017, 27, 82–91.
Repositorio EdocUR-U. Rosario
Universidad del Rosario
instacron:Universidad del Rosario
Land, Vol 10, Iss 14, p 14 (2021)
Volume 10
Issue 1
Nowak, D.J.; Dwyer, J.F. Understanding the benefits and costs of urban forest ecosystems. In Urban and Community Forestry in the Northeast; Springer: Dordrecht, The Netherlands, 2007; pp. 25–46.
Valente, D.; Pasimeni, M.R.; Petrosillo, I. The role of green infrastructures in Italian cities by linking natural and social capital. Ecol. Indic. 2020, 108, 105694. [
Haase, D.; Larondelle, N.; Andersson, E.; Artmann, M.; Borgström, S.; Breuste, J.; Gomez-Baggethun, E.; Gren, Å.; Hamstead, Z.; Hansen, R.; et al. A quantitative review of urban ecosystem service assessments: Concepts, models, and implementation. Ambio 2014, 43, 413–433
Escobedo, F.J.; Kroeger, T.; Wagner, J.E. Urban forests and pollution mitigation: Analyzing ecosystem services and disservices. Environ. Pollut. 2011, 159, 2078–2087
Lyytimäki, J.; Petersen, L.K.; Normander, B.; Bezák, P. Nature as a nuisance? Ecosystem services and disservices to urban lifestyle. Environ. Sci. 2008, 5, 161–172.
Soto, J.R.; Escobedo, F.J.; Khachatryan, H.; Adams, D.C. Consumer demand for urban forest ecosystem services and disservices: Examining trade-offs using choice experiments and best-worst scaling. Ecosyst. Serv. 2018, 29, 31–39.
Andersson, E.; Barthel, S.; Ahrné, K. Measuring social–Ecological dynamics behind the generation of ecosystem services. Ecol. Appl. 2007, 17, 1267–1278.
Ernstson, H.; Barthel, S.; Andersson, E.; Borgström, S.T. Scale-crossing brokers and network governance of urban ecosystem services: The case of stockholm. Ecol. Soc. 2010, 15, 28.
Kabisch, N. Ecosystem service implementation and governance challenges in urban green space planning—The case of Berlin, Germany. Land Use Policy 2015, 42, 557–567.
Lyytimäki, J.; Sipilä, M. Hopping on one leg–The challenge of ecosystem disservices for urban green management. Urban For. Urban Green. 2009, 8, 309–315.
Andersson, E.; McPhearson, T.; Kremer, P.; Gomez-Baggethun, E.; Haase, D.; Tuvendal, M.; Wurster, D. Scale and context dependence of ecosystem service providing units. Ecosyst. Serv. 2015, 12, 157–164.
Haase, D.; Frantzeskaki, N.; Elmqvist, T. Ecosystem Services in Urban Landscapes: Practical Applications and Governance Implications. Ambio 2014, 43, 407–412.
Balooni, K.; Gangopadhyay, K.; Kumar, B.M. Governance for private green spaces in a growing Indian city. Landsc. Urban Plan. 2014, 123, 21–29.
Daw, T.M.; Brown, K.; Rosendo, S.; Pomeroy, R. Applying the ecosystem services concept to poverty alleviation: The need to disaggregate human well-being. Environ. Conserv. 2011, 38, 370–379.
Scopelliti, M.; Carrus, G.; Adinolfi, C.; Suárez-Cáceres, G.; Colangelo, G.; Lafortezza, R.; Panno, A.; Sanesi, G. Staying in touch with nature and well-being in different income groups: The experience of urban parks in Bogotá. Landsc. Urban Plan. 2016, 148, 139–148.
Pascual, U.; Balvanera, P.; Díaz, S.; Pataki, G.; Roth, E.; Stenseke, M.; Watson, R.T.; Dessane, E.B.; Islar, M.; Kelemen, E.; et al. Valuing nature’s contributions to people: The IPBES approach. Curr. Opin. Environ. Sustain. 2017, 26–27, 7–16.
Escobedo, F.J.; Giannico, V.; Jim, C.Y.; Sanesi, G.; Lafortezza, R. Urban forests, ecosystem services, green infrastructure and nature-based solutions: Nexus or evolving metaphors? Urban For. Urban Green. 2019, 37, 3–12.
Dıaz, S.; Pascual, U.M.; Stenseke, B.; Martın-López, R.T.; Watson, Z.; Molnár, R.; Hill, K.M.; Chan, I.A.; Baste, K.A.; Brauman, S.; et al. Assessing nature’s contributions to people: Recognizing culture, and diverse sources of knowledge, can improve assessments. Science 2018, 359, 270–272.
Carriazo, F. Arborización y crimen urbano en Bogotá. IDEAS. 2017. Documentos CEDE 015286, Universidad de los Andes-CEDE. Available
Dobbs, C.; Escobedo, F.J.; Clerici, N.; De La Barrera, F.; Eleuterio, A.A.; MacGregor-Fors, I.; Reyes-Paecke, S.; Vásquez, A.; Camaño, J.D.Z.; Hernández, H.J. Urban ecosystem Services in Latin America: Mismatch between global concepts and regional realities? Urban Ecosyst. 2019, 22, 173–187.
Chaudhry, P.; Singh, B.; Tewari, V.P. Non-market economic valuation in developing countries: Role of participant observation method in CVM analysis. J. For. Econ. 2007, 13, 259–275.
Kenward, R.E.; Whittingham, M.J.; Arampatzis, S.; Manos, B.D.; Hahn, T.; Terry, A.; Simoncini, R.; Alcorn, J.; Bastian, O.; Donlan, M.; et al. Identifying governance strategies that effectively support ecosystem services, resource sustainability, and biodiversity. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2011, 108, 5308–5312.
Kreye, M.M.; Adams, D.C.; Escobedo, F.J.; Soto, J.R. Does policy process influence public values for forest-water resource protection in Florida? Ecol. Econ. 2016, 129, 122–131.
Huang, C.-W.; McDonald, R.I.; Seto, K.C. The importance of land governance for biodiversity conservation in an era of global urban expansion. Landsc. Urban Plan. 2018, 173, 44–50.
Perkins, H.A. Out from the (Green) shadow? Neoliberal hegemony through the market logic of shared urban environmental governance. Politi Geogr. 2009, 28, 395–405.
Turnhout, E.; Neves, K.; De Lijster, E. ‘Measurementality’ in Biodiversity Governance: Knowledge, Transparency, and the Intergovernmental Science-Policy Platform on Biodiversity and Ecosystem Services (Ipbes). Environ. Plan. A Econ. Space 2014, 46, 581–597.
Bell, S.; Hindmoor, A. Governance without government? The case of the forest stewardship council. Public Adm. 2011, 90, 144–159.
Lawrence, A.; De Vreese, R.; Johnston, M.; Bosch, C.C.K.V.D.; Sanesi, G. Urban forest governance: Towards a framework for comparing approaches. Urban For. Urban Green. 2013, 12, 464–473.
Connolly, J.J.; Svendsen, E.S.; Fisher, D.R.; Campbell, L.K. Organizing urban ecosystem services through environmental stewardship governance in New York City. Landsc. Urban Plan. 2013, 109, 76–84.
Van Den Bosch, C.C.K.; Rodbell, P.; Salbitano, F.; Sayers, K.; Villarpando, S.J.; Yokohari, M. The changing governance of urban forests. Unasylva 2018, 69, 37–42.
Launay-Gama, C.; Pachón, M. Prácticas de evaluación de la gobernanza en América Latina; Universidad de Los Andes: Bogotá, Colombia, 2011
Atmi¸s, E.; Batuhan Gün¸sen, H.; Yüceda ˘g, C.; Lise, W. Factors affecting the use of urban forests in Turkey. Turk. J. For. 2017, 18, 1–10.
Shackleton, R.T.; Angelstam, P.; Van Der Waal, B.; Elbakidze, M. Progress made in managing and valuing ecosystem services: A horizon scan of gaps in research, management and governance. Ecosyst. Serv. 2017, 27, 232–241.
Lockwood, M. Good governance for terrestrial protected areas: A framework, principles and performance outcomes. J. Environ. Manag. 2010, 91, 754–766.
Barrett, C.; Gibson, C.; Hoffman, B.; Mccubbins, M. The complex links between governance and biodiversity. Conserv. Biol. 2006, 20, 1358–1366.
Falk, T.; Spangenberg, J.H.; Siegmund-Schultze, M.; Kobbe, S.; Feike, T.; Kuebler, D.; Settele, J.; Vorlaufer, T. Identifying governance challenges in ecosystem services management—Conceptual considerations and comparison of global forest cases. Ecosyst. Serv. 2018, 32, 193–203
Piña, W.H.A.; Martínez, C.I.P. Urban material flow analysis: An approach for Bogotá, Colombia. Ecol. Indic. 2014, 42, 32–42.
Escobedo, F.J.; Clerici, N.; Staudhammer, C.L.; Corzo, G.T. Socio-ecological dynamics and inequality in Bogotá, Colombia’s public urban forests and their ecosystem services. Urban For. Urban Green. 2015, 14, 1040–1053.
Meza, C.A. Crossroads and Conflict. Urbanization, Conservation and Rurality in the Eastern Mountains of Bogotá. Rev. Colomb. Antropol. 2008, 44, 439–480.
Escobedo, F.J.; Clerici, N.; Staudhammer, C.L.; Feged-Rivadeneira, A.; Bohorquez, J.C.; Tovar, G. Trees and Crime in Bogota, Colombia: Is the link an ecosystem disservice or service? Land Use Policy 2018, 78, 583–592.
Wurster, D.; Artmann, M. Development of a Concept for Non-monetary Assessment of Urban Ecosystem Services at the Site Level. Ambio 2014, 43, 454–465.
Martín-López, B.; Iniesta-Arandia, I.; García-Llorente, M.; Palomo, I.; Casado-Arzuaga, I.; Del Amo, D.G.; Gómez-Baggethun, E.; Oteros-Rozas, E.; Palacios-Agundez, I.; Willaarts, B.; et al. Uncovering Ecosystem Service Bundles through Social Preferences. PLoS ONE 2012, 7, e38970.
Dobbs, C.; Hernández-Moreno, Á.; Reyes-Paecke, S.; Miranda, M.D. Exploring temporal dynamics of urban ecosystem services in Latin America: The case of Bogota (Colombia) and Santiago (Chile). Ecol. Indic. 2018, 85, 1068–1080.
Agbenyega, O.; Burgess, P.J.; Cook, M.; Morris, J. Application of an ecosystem function framework to perceptions of community woodlands. Land Use Policy 2009, 26, 551–557
Ricaurte, L.F.; Olaya-Rodríguez, M.H.; Cepeda-Valencia, J.; Lara, D.; Arroyave-Suárez, J.; Finlayson, C.M.; Palomo, I. Future impacts of drivers of change on wetland ecosystem services in Colombia. Glob. Environ. Chang. 2017, 44, 158–169.
Hartter, J.; Goldman, A. Local responses to a forest park in western Uganda: Alternate narratives on fortress conservation. Oryx 2010, 45, 60–68.
Allendorf, T.D.; Yang, J. The role of ecosystem services in park–people relationships: The case of Gaoligongshan Nature Reserve in southwest China. Biol. Conserv. 2013, 167, 187–193.
García-Suaza, A.F.; Guataquí, J.C.; Guerra, J.A.; Maldonado, D. Beyond the Mincer equation: The internal rate of return to higher education in Colombia. Educ Econ. 2014, 22, 328–344.
Kadykalo, A.N.; López-Rodriguez, M.D.; Ainscough, J.; Droste, N.; Ryu, H.; Ávila-Flores, G.; Le Clec’H, S.; Muñoz, M.C.; Nilsson, L.; Rana, S.; et al. Disentangling ‘ecosystem services’ and ‘nature’s contributions to people’. Ecosyst. People 2019, 15, 269–287.
Acey, C. Managing wickedness in the Niger Delta: Can a new approach to multi-stakeholder governance increase voice and sustainability? Landsc. Urban Plan. 2016, 154, 102–114
Sarkki, S. Governance services: Co-producing human well-being with ecosystem services. Ecosyst. Serv. 2017, 27, 82–91.
Repositorio EdocUR-U. Rosario
Universidad del Rosario
instacron:Universidad del Rosario
Land, Vol 10, Iss 14, p 14 (2021)
There is little information concerning how people in the Global South perceive the benefits and costs associated with urban green areas. There is even less information on how governance influences the way people value these highly complex socio-ecolo
Externí odkaz:
https://explore.openaire.eu/search/publication?articleId=doi_dedup___::db265aeb9ca3d05fba2f29a0337b0e5e
Publikováno v:
Labor e Engenho; v. 11 n. 1 (2017): jan./mar.; 18-29
Labor e Engenho; Vol. 11 No. 1 (2017): jan./mar.; 18-29
Labor e Engenho; Vol. 11 Núm. 1 (2017): jan./mar.; 18-29
Labor & Engenho
Universidade Estadual de Campinas (UNICAMP)
instacron:UNICAMP
Labor e Engenho; Vol. 11 No. 1 (2017): jan./mar.; 18-29
Labor e Engenho; Vol. 11 Núm. 1 (2017): jan./mar.; 18-29
Labor & Engenho
Universidade Estadual de Campinas (UNICAMP)
instacron:UNICAMP
This paper proposes a new model for urban spatial planning, based on urban watersheds as planning units for territorial sustainability in the government policy process, territorial divisions and urban interventions with an scarce use of concepts of e
Externí odkaz:
https://explore.openaire.eu/search/publication?articleId=od______3056::f2fb647ddb5a1de7fb398a7c18f70111
https://periodicos.sbu.unicamp.br/ojs/index.php/labore/article/view/8648148
https://periodicos.sbu.unicamp.br/ojs/index.php/labore/article/view/8648148
Autor:
Rodriguez, Darío Tomás
Publikováno v:
RepHipUNR (UNR)
Universidad Nacional de Rosario
instacron:UNR
Universidad Nacional de Rosario
instacron:UNR
Las alteraciones del paisaje en cuencas urbano-rurales causadas por el aumento de asentamientos de población conducen a un progresivo aumento en la cantidad de escurrimiento superficial y producción de sedimentos. Estos procesos son relevantes en z
Externí odkaz:
https://explore.openaire.eu/search/publication?articleId=od______3056::2efcd01a63055ec08878bbff2f897539
Autor:
Basile, Pedro A., Riccardi, Gerardo
Publikováno v:
RepHipUNR (UNR)
Universidad Nacional de Rosario
instacron:UNR
Universidad Nacional de Rosario
instacron:UNR
El desarrollo urbano sin una adecuada planificación puede crear severos problemas de control y gestión del drenaje pluvial en dichas áreas. Una cuenca urbana ha sido en el pasado una cuenca rural, la construcción de casas, edificios comerciales,
Externí odkaz:
https://explore.openaire.eu/search/publication?articleId=od______3056::2361cc76cd8f5447c155a7b2c73be3a1
Autor:
Schmitz, Michael, Cano, Víctor, López, Oscar Andrés, Klarica, Stephanie, Pombo, Adalgiza, Díaz, Juán Felix, Heredia, José, Avendaño, Jaime, Morales, Cecilio
Publikováno v:
Boletín de Geología, Volume: 37, Issue: 1, Pages: 17-26, Published: JUN 2015
En el marco del proyecto de "Investigación Aplicada a la Gestión Integral del Riesgo en Espacios Urbanos" se realizan estudios en red entre FUNVISIS y universidades locales, con el fin de determinar la amenaza sísmica en las cuencas sedimentarias
Externí odkaz:
https://explore.openaire.eu/search/publication?articleId=od_______618::2afa0d87d3becc7613bb784472547eac
http://www.scielo.org.co/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0120-02832015000100002&lng=en&tlng=en
http://www.scielo.org.co/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0120-02832015000100002&lng=en&tlng=en
Autor:
Romero, Hugo, Vásquez, Alexis
Publikováno v:
EURE (Santiago)-Revista Latinoamericana de Estudios Urbano Regionales, Vol 31, Iss 94, Pp 97-117 (2005)
EURE (Santiago) v.31 n.94 2005
SciELO Chile
CONICYT Chile
instacron:CONICYT
EURE (Santiago), Volume: 31, Issue: 94, Pages: 117-97, Published: DEC 2005
EURE (Santiago) v.31 n.94 2005
SciELO Chile
CONICYT Chile
instacron:CONICYT
EURE (Santiago), Volume: 31, Issue: 94, Pages: 117-97, Published: DEC 2005
Las cuencas son complejos sistemas ambientales en que se desarrollan procesos geomorfológicos, hidrológicos, climáticos y ecológicos, que son impactados por la urbanización. En este trabajo se estudian seis cuencas del piedemonte andino de la ci
Externí odkaz:
https://explore.openaire.eu/search/publication?articleId=dedup_wf_001::dfb589d6225cb47cdeab5c52931d0489
http://www.scielo.cl/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0250-71612005009400006
http://www.scielo.cl/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0250-71612005009400006