Zobrazeno 1 - 10
of 33
pro vyhledávání: '"Cirugía pancreática"'
Publikováno v:
Cirugía del Uruguay, Vol 36, Iss 3-4, Pp 312-320 (2020)
Se describe un caso de hiperplaia insular localizada, destacándose el carácter funcionante de la misma, que contrasta con los casos más frecuentes sin repercusión funcional.
Externí odkaz:
https://doaj.org/article/a6adaaf4b0ed479eb509d995504eda57
Publikováno v:
Cirugía del Uruguay, Vol 36, Iss 2, Pp 154-158 (2020)
La resección en los cánceres de colédoco debe incluir la desembocadura del cístico y la cabeza del páncreas. Para evitar la filtración de las suturas situadas en el asa yeyunal después de la pancreatectomía, se deja un tubo de aspiración col
Externí odkaz:
https://doaj.org/article/ec44e674a4ca41f7986961cd3125b3d3
Autor:
Gustavo A. Guerrero-Martínez, Roberto Estrada-Gómez, Armando Basilio-Roque, Rafael Viveros-Luna, César Lorenzo-Yacamix, Pablo A. Dávila-Esparza
Publikováno v:
Cirugía y Cirujanos, Vol 88, Iss 3 (2020)
Antecedentes: La pancreatoduodenectomía o cirugía de Whipple es el procedimiento de elección en el tratamiento de las enfermedades periampulares. A través de los años se ha realizado de manera abierta, y actualmente, gracias a la mejora de los r
Externí odkaz:
https://doaj.org/article/e79964e5d1514ff88c0a866dec669348
Publikováno v:
1. Sabater L, Fabregat J, Boggi U, Valencia U De. Complicaciones después de una pancreaticoduodenectomía. Cir ESPAÑOLA. 2012;90(4):222–32.
2. Malleo. P o stpanc reat ec t o my Complications and Management. Surg Clin NA [Internet]. Elsevier Inc; 2017;96(6):1313–36. Available from: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.suc.2016.07.013
3. Malgras B, Duron S, Gaujoux S, Dokmak S, Aussilhou B. Early biliary complications following pancreaticoduodenectomy : prevalence and risk factors. Int Hepato-Pancreato-Biliary Assoc. 2017;367–74.
4. Santema TB, Visser A, Busch ORC, Dijkgraaf MGW, Goslings JC, Gouma DJ. Hospital costs of complications after a pancreatoduodenectomy. Am J Med Sci [Internet]. Elsevier Masson SAS; 2017;17(8):723–31. Available from: http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/hpb.12440
5. Ansari D, Aronsson L, Fredriksson J, Andersson B, Andersson R. Safety of pancreatic resection in the elderly : a retrospective analysis of 556 patients. Ann Gastroenterol. 2016;29:221–5.
6. Partelli S, Tamburrino D, Crippa S, Ph D, Facci E, Zardini C, et al. Evaluation of a predictive model for pancreatic fistula based on amylase value in drains after pancreatic resection. Am J Surg [Internet]. Elsevier Inc; 2017;(2014). Available from: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.amjsurg.2014.03.011
7. Cheng Q, Zhang B, Zhang Y, Jiang X, Zhang B, Yi B, et al. Predictive Factors for Complications After Pancreaticoduodenectomy. 2017;29(2007):22–9.
8. Iqbal N, Lovegrove RE, Tilney HS, Abraham AT, Bhattacharya S. A comparison of pancreaticoduodenectomy with pylorus preserving pancreaticoduodenectomy : A meta-analysis of 2822 patients *. Eur J Surg Oncol [Internet]. Elsevier Ltd; 2017;34(11):1237–45. Available from: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ejso.2007.12.004
9. Allen 0. Whipple. Treatment of carcinoma of the ampulla of vater. Ann surg. 1935;763–79.
11. Whipple AO. Allen Oldfather Whipple : La cirugía y el cirujano Allen Oldfather Whipple : Surgery and the surgeon. 2002;24.
12. Miyazaki Y, Kokudo T, Amikura K, Kageyama Y. Age does not affect complications and overall survival rate after pancreaticoduodenectomy : Single-center experience and systematic review of literature. 2016;10(January 2008):300–6
13. Brahmbhatt B, Bhurwal A, Lukens FJ, Buchanan MA, Stauffer JA, Asbun HJ. Pancreatic Surgery in the Older Population : A Single Institution ’ s Experience over Two Decades. Curr Gerontol Geriatr Res. Hindawi Publishing Corporation; 2016;2016:336–43.
14. Malleo G. P o stpanc reat ec t o my Complications and Management. Surg Clin NA [Internet]. Elsevier Inc; 2016;96(6):1313–36. Available from: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.suc.2016.07.013
15. Topal B, Aerts R, Hendrickx T, Fieuws S, Penninckx F. Determinants of complications in pancreaticoduodenectomy. 2017;33(2007):488–92.
16. Zheng TLXBS. Pancreatic Fistula after Pancreaticoduodenectomy : Diagnosed according to International Study Group Pancreatic Fistula ( ISGPF ) Definition. Pancreatology [Internet]. IAP and EPC. Published by Elsevier India, a division of Reed Elsevier India Pvt. Ltd.; 2017;7(4):325–31. Available from: http://dx.doi.org/10.1159/000105498
17. Surg HP. Risk factors, predictors and prevention of pancreatic fi stula formation after pancreatoduodenectomy. 2007;557–63.
18. Fuks D, D M, Piessen G, D M, Huet E, D M, et al. Life-threatening postoperative pancreatic fistula ( grade C ) after pancreaticoduodenectomy : incidence, prognosis, and risk factors. AJS [Internet]. Elsevier Inc.; 2009;197(6):702–9. Available from: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.amjsurg.2008.03.004
19. Bassi C, Marchegiani G, Dervenis C, Sarr M. The 2016 update of the International Study Group ( ISGPS ) definition and grading of postoperative pancreatic fistula : 11 Years After. Surgery [Internet]. Elsevier Inc.; 2016;1–8. Available from: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.surg.2016.11.014
20. Seeliger H, D M, Christians S, D M, Angele MK, D M, et al. Risk factors for surgical complications in distal pancreatectomy. AJS [Internet]. Elsevier Inc.; 2017;200(3):311–7. Available from: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.amjsurg.2009.10.022
21. D. Sülberg1, A. M. Chromik1, O. Köster2 WU. Prävention und Management von postoperativen Komplikationen in der Pankreaschirurgie Prevention and Management of Postoperative Complications. Übersicht. 2010;129–38.
22. Lermite E, Sommacale D, Piardi T, Arnaud J, Sauvanet A, Dejong CHC, et al. Complications after pancreatic resection : Diagnosis, prevention and management. Clin Res Hepatol Gastroenterol [Internet]. Elsevier Masson SAS; 2013;37(3):230–9. Available from: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.clinre.2013.01.003
23. D. Ansari1, B. Tingstedt1, G. Lindell1, I. Keussen2, D. Ansari3 RA. Hemorrhage after major pancreatic resection: Incidence, risk factors, management, and outcome. Scand J Surg. 2017;106:47–53.
24. Masahiko Kawamoto, Hiroyuki Konomi, Kiichiro Kobayashi, Shuji Shimizu KY, Tanaka and M. Type of gastrointestinal reconstruction affects postoperative recovery after pancreatic head resection. J Hepatobiliary Pancreat Surg. 2006;336–43.
25. Hashimoto Y, Traverso LW. Incidence of pancreatic anastomotic failure and delayed gastric emptying after pancreatoduodenectomy in 507 consecutive patients : Use of a web-based calculator to improve homogeneity of definition. Surgery [Internet]. Mosby, Inc.; 2017;147(4):503–15. Available from: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.surg.2009.10.034
26. Wente MN, Bassi C, Dervenis C, Fingerhut A. Position statement Delayed gastric emptying ( DGE ) after pancreatic surgery : A suggested definition by the International Study Group of Pancreatic Surgery ( ISGPS ). Surgery. 2007;761–8.
27. Bell R, Pandanaboyana S, Shah N, Bartlett A, Windsor JA, Smith AM. Meta-analysis of antecolic versus retrocolic gastric reconstruction after a pylorus-preserving pancreatoduodenectomy. Am J Med Sci [Internet]. Elsevier Masson SAS; 2017;17(3):202–8. Available from: http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/hpb.12344
28. Sergio hoyos ád, gloria franco jc, gómez s, sánchez j. Evaluación y seguimiento de los pacientes sometidos a operación de whipple o duodenopancreatectomía cefálica en un hospital de iv nivel de medellín. Rev colomb cir. 2012;114–20.
29. Kong h, introduccion a. Principios éticos para las investigaciones médicas en seres humanos. 2008
30. Salud mde, salud elmde. Ministerio de salud resolucion numero 8430 de 1993. 1993;1993(octubre 4):1–19.
31. Higdon j, topp r. How to develop a budget for a research proposal. 2004;26(8):922–9.
32. Cameron JL, Riall TS, Coleman J, Belcher KA. Mil pancreaticoduodenectomías consecutivas. Ann Surg . 2006; 244 (1): 10-15. doi: 10.1097 / 01.sla.0000217673.04165.ea
33. Aranha GV, Hodul PJ, Creech S, Jacobs W. Zero mortality after 152 consecutive pancreaticoduodenectomies with pancreaticogastrostomy. J Am Coll Surg. 2003;197:223-31
34. Chan C, Franssen B, Uscanga L, Robles G, Campuzano M. Pancreatoduodenectomy: Results in a large volume center. Rev Gastroenterol México. 2006;71:252-6.
35. Hoyos S,Guzmán C. Resultados de duodenopancreatectomía cefálica en el Hospital Pablo Tobón Uribe de Medellín en un período de tres años. Rev Colomb Cir. 2008;23:12-5.
36. Buchler M, Wagner M, Schmied BM, Uhl W, Friess H, Z’Graggen K. Changes in morbidity after pancreatic resection: Toward the end of completion pancreatectomy. Arch Surg. 2003;138:1310-4
37. Cameron, J. L., & He, J. (2015). Two thousand consecutive pancreaticoduodenectomies. Journal of the American College of Surgeons, 220(4), 530–536. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jamcollsurg.2014.12.031
Repositorio EdocUR-U. Rosario
Universidad del Rosario
instacron:Universidad del Rosario
2. Malleo. P o stpanc reat ec t o my Complications and Management. Surg Clin NA [Internet]. Elsevier Inc; 2017;96(6):1313–36. Available from: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.suc.2016.07.013
3. Malgras B, Duron S, Gaujoux S, Dokmak S, Aussilhou B. Early biliary complications following pancreaticoduodenectomy : prevalence and risk factors. Int Hepato-Pancreato-Biliary Assoc. 2017;367–74.
4. Santema TB, Visser A, Busch ORC, Dijkgraaf MGW, Goslings JC, Gouma DJ. Hospital costs of complications after a pancreatoduodenectomy. Am J Med Sci [Internet]. Elsevier Masson SAS; 2017;17(8):723–31. Available from: http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/hpb.12440
5. Ansari D, Aronsson L, Fredriksson J, Andersson B, Andersson R. Safety of pancreatic resection in the elderly : a retrospective analysis of 556 patients. Ann Gastroenterol. 2016;29:221–5.
6. Partelli S, Tamburrino D, Crippa S, Ph D, Facci E, Zardini C, et al. Evaluation of a predictive model for pancreatic fistula based on amylase value in drains after pancreatic resection. Am J Surg [Internet]. Elsevier Inc; 2017;(2014). Available from: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.amjsurg.2014.03.011
7. Cheng Q, Zhang B, Zhang Y, Jiang X, Zhang B, Yi B, et al. Predictive Factors for Complications After Pancreaticoduodenectomy. 2017;29(2007):22–9.
8. Iqbal N, Lovegrove RE, Tilney HS, Abraham AT, Bhattacharya S. A comparison of pancreaticoduodenectomy with pylorus preserving pancreaticoduodenectomy : A meta-analysis of 2822 patients *. Eur J Surg Oncol [Internet]. Elsevier Ltd; 2017;34(11):1237–45. Available from: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ejso.2007.12.004
9. Allen 0. Whipple. Treatment of carcinoma of the ampulla of vater. Ann surg. 1935;763–79.
11. Whipple AO. Allen Oldfather Whipple : La cirugía y el cirujano Allen Oldfather Whipple : Surgery and the surgeon. 2002;24.
12. Miyazaki Y, Kokudo T, Amikura K, Kageyama Y. Age does not affect complications and overall survival rate after pancreaticoduodenectomy : Single-center experience and systematic review of literature. 2016;10(January 2008):300–6
13. Brahmbhatt B, Bhurwal A, Lukens FJ, Buchanan MA, Stauffer JA, Asbun HJ. Pancreatic Surgery in the Older Population : A Single Institution ’ s Experience over Two Decades. Curr Gerontol Geriatr Res. Hindawi Publishing Corporation; 2016;2016:336–43.
14. Malleo G. P o stpanc reat ec t o my Complications and Management. Surg Clin NA [Internet]. Elsevier Inc; 2016;96(6):1313–36. Available from: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.suc.2016.07.013
15. Topal B, Aerts R, Hendrickx T, Fieuws S, Penninckx F. Determinants of complications in pancreaticoduodenectomy. 2017;33(2007):488–92.
16. Zheng TLXBS. Pancreatic Fistula after Pancreaticoduodenectomy : Diagnosed according to International Study Group Pancreatic Fistula ( ISGPF ) Definition. Pancreatology [Internet]. IAP and EPC. Published by Elsevier India, a division of Reed Elsevier India Pvt. Ltd.; 2017;7(4):325–31. Available from: http://dx.doi.org/10.1159/000105498
17. Surg HP. Risk factors, predictors and prevention of pancreatic fi stula formation after pancreatoduodenectomy. 2007;557–63.
18. Fuks D, D M, Piessen G, D M, Huet E, D M, et al. Life-threatening postoperative pancreatic fistula ( grade C ) after pancreaticoduodenectomy : incidence, prognosis, and risk factors. AJS [Internet]. Elsevier Inc.; 2009;197(6):702–9. Available from: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.amjsurg.2008.03.004
19. Bassi C, Marchegiani G, Dervenis C, Sarr M. The 2016 update of the International Study Group ( ISGPS ) definition and grading of postoperative pancreatic fistula : 11 Years After. Surgery [Internet]. Elsevier Inc.; 2016;1–8. Available from: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.surg.2016.11.014
20. Seeliger H, D M, Christians S, D M, Angele MK, D M, et al. Risk factors for surgical complications in distal pancreatectomy. AJS [Internet]. Elsevier Inc.; 2017;200(3):311–7. Available from: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.amjsurg.2009.10.022
21. D. Sülberg1, A. M. Chromik1, O. Köster2 WU. Prävention und Management von postoperativen Komplikationen in der Pankreaschirurgie Prevention and Management of Postoperative Complications. Übersicht. 2010;129–38.
22. Lermite E, Sommacale D, Piardi T, Arnaud J, Sauvanet A, Dejong CHC, et al. Complications after pancreatic resection : Diagnosis, prevention and management. Clin Res Hepatol Gastroenterol [Internet]. Elsevier Masson SAS; 2013;37(3):230–9. Available from: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.clinre.2013.01.003
23. D. Ansari1, B. Tingstedt1, G. Lindell1, I. Keussen2, D. Ansari3 RA. Hemorrhage after major pancreatic resection: Incidence, risk factors, management, and outcome. Scand J Surg. 2017;106:47–53.
24. Masahiko Kawamoto, Hiroyuki Konomi, Kiichiro Kobayashi, Shuji Shimizu KY, Tanaka and M. Type of gastrointestinal reconstruction affects postoperative recovery after pancreatic head resection. J Hepatobiliary Pancreat Surg. 2006;336–43.
25. Hashimoto Y, Traverso LW. Incidence of pancreatic anastomotic failure and delayed gastric emptying after pancreatoduodenectomy in 507 consecutive patients : Use of a web-based calculator to improve homogeneity of definition. Surgery [Internet]. Mosby, Inc.; 2017;147(4):503–15. Available from: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.surg.2009.10.034
26. Wente MN, Bassi C, Dervenis C, Fingerhut A. Position statement Delayed gastric emptying ( DGE ) after pancreatic surgery : A suggested definition by the International Study Group of Pancreatic Surgery ( ISGPS ). Surgery. 2007;761–8.
27. Bell R, Pandanaboyana S, Shah N, Bartlett A, Windsor JA, Smith AM. Meta-analysis of antecolic versus retrocolic gastric reconstruction after a pylorus-preserving pancreatoduodenectomy. Am J Med Sci [Internet]. Elsevier Masson SAS; 2017;17(3):202–8. Available from: http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/hpb.12344
28. Sergio hoyos ád, gloria franco jc, gómez s, sánchez j. Evaluación y seguimiento de los pacientes sometidos a operación de whipple o duodenopancreatectomía cefálica en un hospital de iv nivel de medellín. Rev colomb cir. 2012;114–20.
29. Kong h, introduccion a. Principios éticos para las investigaciones médicas en seres humanos. 2008
30. Salud mde, salud elmde. Ministerio de salud resolucion numero 8430 de 1993. 1993;1993(octubre 4):1–19.
31. Higdon j, topp r. How to develop a budget for a research proposal. 2004;26(8):922–9.
32. Cameron JL, Riall TS, Coleman J, Belcher KA. Mil pancreaticoduodenectomías consecutivas. Ann Surg . 2006; 244 (1): 10-15. doi: 10.1097 / 01.sla.0000217673.04165.ea
33. Aranha GV, Hodul PJ, Creech S, Jacobs W. Zero mortality after 152 consecutive pancreaticoduodenectomies with pancreaticogastrostomy. J Am Coll Surg. 2003;197:223-31
34. Chan C, Franssen B, Uscanga L, Robles G, Campuzano M. Pancreatoduodenectomy: Results in a large volume center. Rev Gastroenterol México. 2006;71:252-6.
35. Hoyos S,Guzmán C. Resultados de duodenopancreatectomía cefálica en el Hospital Pablo Tobón Uribe de Medellín en un período de tres años. Rev Colomb Cir. 2008;23:12-5.
36. Buchler M, Wagner M, Schmied BM, Uhl W, Friess H, Z’Graggen K. Changes in morbidity after pancreatic resection: Toward the end of completion pancreatectomy. Arch Surg. 2003;138:1310-4
37. Cameron, J. L., & He, J. (2015). Two thousand consecutive pancreaticoduodenectomies. Journal of the American College of Surgeons, 220(4), 530–536. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jamcollsurg.2014.12.031
Repositorio EdocUR-U. Rosario
Universidad del Rosario
instacron:Universidad del Rosario
Antecedentes: La pancreatoduodenectomía es una de las cirugías abdominales más complejas y con mayores tasas de morbimortalidad. Múltiples estudios han identificado los factores de riesgo para las diferentes complicaciones asociadas y han demostr
Externí odkaz:
https://explore.openaire.eu/search/publication?articleId=doi_dedup___::2818a4b3dc480b1d68f56d56578e1fa4
https://repository.urosario.edu.co/handle/10336/25575
https://repository.urosario.edu.co/handle/10336/25575
Publikováno v:
GASTROENTEROLOGIA Y HEPATOLOGIA
r-ISABIAL. Repositorio Institucional de Producción Científica del Instituto de Investigación Biomédica y Sanitaria de Alicante
instname
r-ISABIAL. Repositorio Institucional de Producción Científica del Instituto de Investigación Biomédica y Sanitaria de Alicante
instname
Post-operative morbidity of pancreatectomies occurs in up to 40-50% of patients, even in modern series. There is a need to find a simple scale in order to identify patients with increased risk of developing major post-operative complications after pa
Externí odkaz:
https://explore.openaire.eu/search/publication?articleId=RECOLECTA___::60017b456b8ca42e83bf535d8bcb978b
https://fundanet.isabial.san.gva.es/publicaciones/ProdCientif/PublicacionFrw.aspx?id=7162
https://fundanet.isabial.san.gva.es/publicaciones/ProdCientif/PublicacionFrw.aspx?id=7162
Autor:
Tejos S., Rodrigo, Rojas C., Alejandro, Rebolledo A., Rolando, Achurra T., Pablo, Pacheco S., Sergio, Briceño V., Eduardo, Jarufe C., Nicolás, Martínez C., Jorge, Guerra C., Juan Francisco
Publikováno v:
Revista chilena de cirugía, Volume: 70, Issue: 4, Pages: 329-335, Published: AUG 2018
Resumen Objetivo: Determinar la frecuencia de reingreso hospitalario y sus factores asociados en pacientes sometidos a resecciones hepáticas o pancreáticas en nuestro centro. Metodología: Se revisaron registros de pacientes sometidos a resecciones
Externí odkaz:
https://explore.openaire.eu/search/publication?articleId=od_______614::69fdb918df8a6cfe826e0eb88d2de70d
http://www.scielo.cl/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0718-40262018000400329&lng=en&tlng=en
http://www.scielo.cl/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0718-40262018000400329&lng=en&tlng=en
Autor:
Tejos S.,Rodrigo, Rojas C.,Alejandro, Rebolledo A.,Rolando, Achurra T.,Pablo, Pacheco S.,Sergio, Briceño V.,Eduardo, Jarufe C.,Nicolás, Martínez C.,Jorge, Guerra C.,Juan Francisco
Publikováno v:
Revista chilena de cirugía v.70 n.4 2018
SciELO Chile
CONICYT Chile
instacron:CONICYT
SciELO Chile
CONICYT Chile
instacron:CONICYT
Resumen Objetivo: Determinar la frecuencia de reingreso hospitalario y sus factores asociados en pacientes sometidos a resecciones hepáticas o pancreáticas en nuestro centro. Metodología: Se revisaron registros de pacientes sometidos a resecciones
Externí odkaz:
https://explore.openaire.eu/search/publication?articleId=od______3056::69fdb918df8a6cfe826e0eb88d2de70d
http://www.scielo.cl/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0718-40262018000400329
http://www.scielo.cl/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0718-40262018000400329
Publikováno v:
Cirugía del Uruguay, Vol 41, Iss 5, Pp 520-524 (1971)
Se realiza una breve reseña histórica del transplante pancreático; se exponen el material y los métodos empleados para el fin de este trabajo y finalmente se realiza una valoración del mismo. Se discute la utilidad de un transplante pancreático
Externí odkaz:
https://doaj.org/article/45fbce75f5054c7088c3d6a4c5b0940f
Publikováno v:
Dadun. Depósito Académico Digital de la Universidad de Navarra
instname
Anales del Sistema Sanitario de Navarra v.29 suppl.2 2006
SciELO España. Revistas Científicas Españolas de Ciencias de la Salud
instname
Anales del Sistema Sanitario de Navarra v.29 suppl.2 2006
SciELO España. Revistas Científicas Españolas de Ciencias de la Salud
Diabetes mellitus is a health concern of the first order, given the high level of associated morbidity and mortality. The objective, in order to slow down the advance of its complications before they become irreversible, is based on correct metabolic
Externí odkaz:
https://explore.openaire.eu/search/publication?articleId=doi_dedup___::cb181f9cee56413a0a50aa29a8f313bc
https://doi.org/10.4321/s1137-66272006000400011
https://doi.org/10.4321/s1137-66272006000400011
Autor:
C. Pastor, Víctor Valentí, Fernando Pardo, I. Poveda, Pablo Martí-Cruchaga, G. Zozaya, F. Rotellar
Publikováno v:
Anales del Sistema Sanitario de Navarra v.28 suppl.3 2005
SciELO España. Revistas Científicas Españolas de Ciencias de la Salud
instname
Dadun. Depósito Académico Digital de la Universidad de Navarra
SciELO España. Revistas Científicas Españolas de Ciencias de la Salud
instname
Dadun. Depósito Académico Digital de la Universidad de Navarra
The development of laparoscopic surgery also includes the more complex procedures of abdominal surgery such as those that affect the liver and the pancreas. From diagnostic laparoscopy, accompanied by laparoscopic echography, to major hepatic or panc
Externí odkaz:
https://explore.openaire.eu/search/publication?articleId=doi_dedup___::baa621d85cd37a279ea0d4b55f656aec
https://hdl.handle.net/10171/22604
https://hdl.handle.net/10171/22604