Zobrazeno 1 - 10
of 15
pro vyhledávání: '"Christopher B. Seaman"'
Publikováno v:
SSRN Electronic Journal.
Externí odkaz:
https://explore.openaire.eu/search/publication?articleId=doi_________::2fd152f29596de84ac416b607911d357
https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.4384661
https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.4384661
Autor:
Christopher B. Seaman
Publikováno v:
SSRN Electronic Journal.
Noncompete clauses in employment agreements are both common and controversial. An estimated 28 million Americans—nearly 20% of the U.S. workforce—are currently bound by a noncompete. The traditional view that noncompete agreements can facilitate
Externí odkaz:
https://explore.openaire.eu/search/publication?articleId=doi_________::bf5f1e4576fcc534525f44647c3aa23a
https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3740693
https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3740693
Autor:
Christopher B. Seaman
Publikováno v:
Research Handbook on the Economics of Intellectual Property Law ISBN: 9781789903997
Externí odkaz:
https://explore.openaire.eu/search/publication?articleId=doi_________::ed620d38273bdfb6d623c03df07d189c
https://doi.org/10.4337/9781789903997.00058
https://doi.org/10.4337/9781789903997.00058
Autor:
Ryan T. Holte, Christopher B. Seaman
Publikováno v:
SSRN Electronic Journal.
Ten years after the U.S. Supreme Court’s 2006 seminal decision in eBay v. MercExchange, the availability of injunctive relief in patent cases remains hotly contested. For example, in a recent decision in the long-running litigation between Apple an
Externí odkaz:
https://explore.openaire.eu/search/publication?articleId=doi_________::3dc1f76579d735034d8f3beb6f41d486
https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2816097
https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2816097
Autor:
Christopher B. Seaman
Publikováno v:
SSRN Electronic Journal.
The Supreme Court’s 2006 decision in eBay v. MercExchange is widely regarded as one of the most important patent law rulings of the past decade. Historically, patent holders who won on the merits in litigation nearly always obtained a permanent inj
Externí odkaz:
https://explore.openaire.eu/search/publication?articleId=doi_________::4df1e0df3fd98d5985c45dac80c752d9
https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2632834
https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2632834
Publikováno v:
SSRN Electronic Journal.
In August 2014, thirty-one law professors signed a letter in opposition to proposed federal legislation to create a civil cause of action for trade secret misappropriation. We write to express continued concerns about the current version of this legi
Externí odkaz:
https://explore.openaire.eu/search/publication?articleId=doi_________::ad74585fef679a9b28509462f1963c3b
https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2699760
https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2699760
Autor:
Debra Lyn Bassett, Anya Bernstein, Jeremy W. Bock, Patrick Joseph Borchers, Michael J. Burstein, Michael A. Carrier, Bernard Chao, Colleen V. Chien, Jorge L. Contreras, Scott Dodson, Joshua A. Douglas, Catherine Ross Dunham, Katherine J. Florey, Roger A. Ford, Leah Chan Grinvald, Paul R. Gugliuzza, Timothy R. Holbrook, William Hubbard, Sapna Kumar, Megan M. La Belle, Mark A. Lemley, David I. Levine, Brian J. Love, Joseph Scott Miller, Patricia W. Hatamyar Moore, Ira Steven Nathenson, Xuan-Thao Nguyen, Philip A. Pucillo, Greg Reilly, Charles W. (Rocky) Rhodes, Cassandra Burke Robertson, Christopher B. Seaman, Gregory C. Sisk, Howard M. Wasserman, Matthew K. Telford
Publikováno v:
SSRN Electronic Journal.
Beginning with its 1998 decision in Red Wing Shoe Co. v. Hockerson-Halberstadt, Inc., 148 F.3d 1355, 1360 (Fed. Cir. 1998), the Federal Circuit has embraced a rigid, bright-line rule for the exercise of personal jurisdiction in patent declaratory jud
Externí odkaz:
https://explore.openaire.eu/search/publication?articleId=doi_________::b2731270b3af77fd2a1d63484fb3101d
https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2707288
https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2707288
Autor:
Christopher B. Seaman, Jason Rantanen
Publikováno v:
SSRN Electronic Journal.
This amicus brief was filed on behalf of several intellectual property law professors in Halo v. Pulse and Stryker v. Zimmer regarding the appropriate standard for enhancing (increasing) damages under section 284 of the Patent Act, 35 U.S.C. § 284.
Externí odkaz:
https://explore.openaire.eu/search/publication?articleId=doi_________::232716394e3a2856d3096630fd0ee890
https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2704575
https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2704575