Zobrazeno 1 - 5
of 5
pro vyhledávání: '"Charles, Mick"'
Autor:
Charles A. Reitman, Charles Mick, William L Tontz, Jamie L. Baisden, Christopher P. Kauffman, William C. Watters, Paul A. Anderson, Raj D. Rao, Heidi Prather, Jeffrey M. Hills, David A. Wong, Jerome Schofferman, Jeffrey C. Wang, K. Daniel Riew, Christopher J. Standaert, Mark A. Lorenz, James S. Harrop, Jeffrey M. Spivak, Zoher Ghogawala, Sanford E. Emery, William Mitchell, Christopher M. Bono, Christopher G. Furey, Daniel K. Resnick, Ray M. Baker, Michael H. Heggeness, William J. Sullivan
Publikováno v:
The spine journal : official journal of the North American Spine Society. 21(9)
High quality evidence is difficult to generate, leaving substantial knowledge gaps in the treatment of spinal conditions. Appropriate use criteria (AUC) are a means of determining appropriate recommendations when high quality evidence is lacking.Defi
Autor:
Charles Mick
Publikováno v:
The Spine Journal. 14:205-208
Autor:
Charles Mick
Publikováno v:
Seminars in Spine Surgery. 24:103-111
Ideally, each patient should be provided with accurate information on outcome and cost and select care based on the best value and personal care preferences. Unfortunately, useful information on outcome is often absent or equivocal, and information o
Autor:
Bradford L. Currier, Charles Mick, David B. Nash, Frank M. Phillips, Jeffrey A. Rihn, Todd R. Allen, Sigurd Berven, Todd J. Albert, Alan Crockard, Steven D. Glassman
Publikováno v:
American Journal of Medical Quality. 24:4S-14S
Spinal disorders are extremely common, debilitating, and costly to the payer and to society as a whole. The rate and cost of various spinal treatments are increasing at an astonishing rate, but it is unclear whether the resulting quality of spinal ca
Publikováno v:
The spine journal : official journal of the North American Spine Society. 10(3)
This commentary is a product of the North American Spine Society (NASS). It was approved by the NASS Board of Directors and accepted for publication outside The Spine Journal's peer review process.