Zobrazeno 1 - 10
of 44
pro vyhledávání: '"Caroline Devred"'
Autor:
Caroline Devred, Leila Amgoud
Publikováno v:
Lecture Notes in Computer Science ISBN: 9783642239625
SUM
5th International Conference on Scalable Uncertainty Management, SUM 2011
5th International Conference on Scalable Uncertainty Management, SUM 2011, 2011, Dayton, United States. pp.110-122, ⟨10.1007/978-3-642-23963-2_10⟩
SUM
5th International Conference on Scalable Uncertainty Management, SUM 2011
5th International Conference on Scalable Uncertainty Management, SUM 2011, 2011, Dayton, United States. pp.110-122, ⟨10.1007/978-3-642-23963-2_10⟩
Argumentation is a promising approach for defeasible reasoning. It consists of justifying each plausible conclusion by arguments. Since the available information may be inconsistent, a conclusion and its negation may both be justified. The arguments
Publikováno v:
International Journal of Approximate Reasoning
International Journal of Approximate Reasoning, Elsevier, 2011, 52 (9), pp.1363-1391. ⟨10.1016/j.ijar.2011.07.005⟩
International Journal of Approximate Reasoning, Elsevier, 2011, 52 (9), pp.1363-1391. ⟨10.1016/j.ijar.2011.07.005⟩
Practical reasoning (PR), which is concerned with the generic question of what to do, is generally seen as a two steps process: (1) deliberation, in which an agent decides what state of affairs it wants to reach – that is, its desires; and (2) mean
Externí odkaz:
https://explore.openaire.eu/search/publication?articleId=doi_dedup___::db0e1d17d326155da33d47d6cccf6148
https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/hal-02875295
https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/hal-02875295
Publikováno v:
International Journal on Artificial Intelligence Tools
International Journal on Artificial Intelligence Tools, World Scientific Publishing, 2011, 19 (04), pp.487-510. ⟨10.1142/S0218213010000297⟩
International Journal on Artificial Intelligence Tools, World Scientific Publishing, 2011, 19 (04), pp.487-510. ⟨10.1142/S0218213010000297⟩
There already exist some links between argumentation and game theory. For instance, dynamic games can be used for simulating interactions between agents in an argumentation process. In this paper, we establish a new link between these domains in a st
Externí odkaz:
https://explore.openaire.eu/search/publication?articleId=doi_dedup___::fb835195f252327efd4e775600810696
https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/hal-02875299
https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/hal-02875299
Publikováno v:
2010 22nd International Conference on Tools with Artificial Intelligence (ICTAI)
2010 22nd International Conference on Tools with Artificial Intelligence (ICTAI), Oct 2010, Arras, France. pp.207-214, ⟨10.1109/ICTAI.2010.36⟩
ICTAI (1)
2010 22nd International Conference on Tools with Artificial Intelligence (ICTAI), Oct 2010, Arras, France. pp.207-214, ⟨10.1109/ICTAI.2010.36⟩
ICTAI (1)
We consider argumentation systems taking into account several attack relations of different strength. We focus on the impact of various strength attacks on the semantics of such systems, and particularly on the decision problem of credulous acceptanc
Externí odkaz:
https://explore.openaire.eu/search/publication?articleId=doi_dedup___::96f09db5f77fb974b0dd5253f1dfc231
https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/hal-02875410
https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/hal-02875410
Publikováno v:
European Conference in Artifical Intelligence (ECAI)
European Conference in Artifical Intelligence (ECAI), Aug 2010, Lisbonne, Portugal. pp.995-996
[Research Report] IRIT-2010-13, IRIT-Institut de recherche en informatique de Toulouse. 2010
HAL
European Conference in Artifical Intelligence (ECAI), Aug 2010, Lisbonne, Portugal. pp.995-996
[Research Report] IRIT-2010-13, IRIT-Institut de recherche en informatique de Toulouse. 2010
HAL
We consider argumentation systems taking into account several attack relations of different strength. We focus on the impact of various strength attacks on the semantics of such systems. First, we refine the classical notion of defence, by comparing
Externí odkaz:
https://explore.openaire.eu/search/publication?articleId=dedup_wf_001::ae6be8df840bdb313c81f42f5f0d7b23
https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/hal-02875419
https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/hal-02875419
Publikováno v:
[Research Report] IRIT-2010-07, IRIT-Institut de recherche en informatique de Toulouse. 2010
HAL
HAL
We consider argumentation systems taking into account several attack relations of different strength. We focus on the impact of various strength attacks on the semantics of such systems, and particularly on the decision problem of credulous acceptanc
Externí odkaz:
https://explore.openaire.eu/search/publication?articleId=dedup_wf_001::e3a6d6c561a9b7416029983ad0728be9
https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/hal-02883999/file/Rapport-IRIT-2010-7.pdf
https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/hal-02883999/file/Rapport-IRIT-2010-7.pdf
Publikováno v:
Journal of Applied Non-Classical Logics
Journal of Applied Non-Classical Logics, Taylor & Francis, 2009, 19 (3), pp.311-369
HAL
Journal of Applied Non-Classical Logics, Taylor & Francis, 2009, 19 (3), pp.311-369
HAL
We present two prudent semantics within Dung's theory of argumentation. They are based on two new notions of extension, referred to as p-extension and c-extension. Two arguments cannot belong to the same p-extension whenever one of them attacks indir
Externí odkaz:
https://explore.openaire.eu/search/publication?articleId=doi_dedup___::3bdedcb225d1ab340355262bc289decf
https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/hal-00868615
https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/hal-00868615
Publikováno v:
Lecture Notes in Computer Science ISBN: 9783642002069
Argumentation in Multi-Agent Systems : Fifth International Workshop, ArgMAS 2008, Estoril, Portugal, May 12, 2008, Revised Selected and Invited Papers
Iyad Rahwan; Pavlos Moraitis. Argumentation in Multi-Agent Systems : Fifth International Workshop, ArgMAS 2008, Estoril, Portugal, May 12, 2008, Revised Selected and Invited Papers, 5384, Springer-Verlag, pp.37-56, 2009, Lecture Notes in Artificial Intelligence (LNAI)
[Research Report] IRIT-2007-14, IRIT-Institut de recherche en informatique de Toulouse. 2007
HAL
Argumentation in Multi-Agent Systems : Fifth International Workshop, ArgMAS 2008, Estoril, Portugal, May 12, 2008, Revised Selected and Invited Papers
Iyad Rahwan; Pavlos Moraitis. Argumentation in Multi-Agent Systems : Fifth International Workshop, ArgMAS 2008, Estoril, Portugal, May 12, 2008, Revised Selected and Invited Papers, 5384, Springer-Verlag, pp.37-56, 2009, Lecture Notes in Artificial Intelligence (LNAI)
[Research Report] IRIT-2007-14, IRIT-Institut de recherche en informatique de Toulouse. 2007
HAL
International audience
Externí odkaz:
https://explore.openaire.eu/search/publication?articleId=doi_dedup___::854e44281e0357eff755dcb5d71e747e
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-00207-6_3
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-00207-6_3
Autor:
Caroline Devred, Sylvie Doutre
Publikováno v:
Journées Nationales de l'IA Fondamentale 2008
Journées Nationales de l'IA Fondamentale 2008, 2008, Paris, France
HAL
Journées Nationales de l'IA Fondamentale 2008, 2008, Paris, France
HAL
Le système d’argumentation à contrainte généralise le cadre du système d’argumentation classique de Dung, et permet de capturer les sémantiques d’acceptabilité existantes dans ce cadre et dans ses extensions. Nous cherchons dans cet arti
Externí odkaz:
https://explore.openaire.eu/search/publication?articleId=dedup_wf_001::7a724e7b3a73725967b91e4e85cc46f8
https://hal.univ-angers.fr/hal-03256211/document
https://hal.univ-angers.fr/hal-03256211/document
Publikováno v:
Lecture Notes in Computer Science ISBN: 9783540752554
ECSQARU
European Conference on Symbolic and Quantitative Approaches to Reasoning with Uncertainty (ECSQARU)
European Conference on Symbolic and Quantitative Approaches to Reasoning with Uncertainty (ECSQARU), Oct 2007, Hammamet, Tunisia. pp.259-270, ⟨10.1007/978-3-540-75256-1_25⟩
ECSQARU
European Conference on Symbolic and Quantitative Approaches to Reasoning with Uncertainty (ECSQARU)
European Conference on Symbolic and Quantitative Approaches to Reasoning with Uncertainty (ECSQARU), Oct 2007, Hammamet, Tunisia. pp.259-270, ⟨10.1007/978-3-540-75256-1_25⟩
In this paper we propose semantics for acceptablity in partial argumentation frameworks (PAF). The PAF is an extension of Dung's argumentation framework and has been introduced in [1] for merging argumentation frameworks. It consists in adding a new
Externí odkaz:
https://explore.openaire.eu/search/publication?articleId=doi_dedup___::e95f90ab190241855843c4492a398cc6
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-75256-1_25
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-75256-1_25