Zobrazeno 1 - 5
of 5
pro vyhledávání: '"Camila Rodrigues Jourdan"'
Autor:
Camila Rodrigues Jourdan
Publikováno v:
O Que Nos Faz Pensar, Vol 29, Iss 49, Pp 57-77 (2022)
The paper resumes the contemporary discussion on deep disagreements, placing the problem in relation to the interpretations of the notions of 'form of life' and 'language games' within Wittgenstein's late Philosophy. Based on that, it provides a cons
Externí odkaz:
https://doaj.org/article/1b8a3e3023654b8394fea97ecb4e57b5
Autor:
Camila Rodrigues Jourdan
Publikováno v:
O Que Nos Faz Pensar, Vol 28, Iss 45, Pp 517-529 (2019)
The article retakes the philosophical thought of Sergio Fernandes from the authoress experience, while her listener and reader. The text thus highlights the influence of Sergio in her formation and in her own research. Thereby, the notions of Conscie
Externí odkaz:
https://doaj.org/article/86eda81487194d34a5531285f0888c19
Autor:
Camila Rodrigues Jourdan
Publikováno v:
Horizonte, Vol 10, Iss 28, Pp 1380-1394 (2012)
O artigo clarifica em que medida a Lógica, no sentido mais comum e até ingênuo do termo, enquanto composta pelas leis necessárias do pensamento correto, pode ser entendida como Mística. Isto parece estranho, pois a Mística é normalmente entend
Externí odkaz:
https://doaj.org/article/aeb2867ba29048e084c23d7af6101229
Autor:
Camila Rodrigues Jourdan
Publikováno v:
O que nos faz pensar. 28:517-529
The article retakes the philosophical thought of Sergio Fernandes from the authoress experience, while her listener and reader. The text thus highlights the influence of Sergio in her formation and in her own research. Thereby, the notions of Conscie
Externí odkaz:
https://explore.openaire.eu/search/publication?articleId=doi_________::d3a6cecd753207a4ca85b8672911ffff
https://doi.org/10.32334/oqnfp.2019n45a668
https://doi.org/10.32334/oqnfp.2019n45a668
Autor:
Camila Rodrigues Jourdan
Publikováno v:
Philósophos - Revista de Filosofia. 18
This paper analyzes the much maligned remarks of Wittgenstein on Godel's theorem. It is not intended defend these comments, nor argue that Wittgenstein said something that he did not. In fact, it would be impossible ignore what is textual just to pro
Externí odkaz:
https://explore.openaire.eu/search/publication?articleId=doi_________::fc4e20410bff23cb09b8968cc10399f6
https://doi.org/10.5216/phi.v18i2.17864
https://doi.org/10.5216/phi.v18i2.17864