Zobrazeno 1 - 10
of 40
pro vyhledávání: '"Budzynska K"'
Publikováno v:
BMC Complementary and Alternative Medicine, Vol 12, Iss Suppl 1, p P386 (2012)
Externí odkaz:
https://doaj.org/article/b5797f25e6ae4fc08d3dad82ebbc38b3
Autor:
Prakken, H., de Winter, Michiel, Modgil, S.J., Budzynska, K., Lawrence, J., Sub Intelligent Systems, Intelligent Systems
Publikováno v:
Computational Models of Argument, 305, 85. IOS Press
While work on abstract argumentation frameworks has greatly advanced the study of argumentation in AI, its use is not without danger. One danger is that the direct modelling of examples in abstract frameworks instead of through a theory of the struct
Externí odkaz:
https://explore.openaire.eu/search/publication?articleId=narcis______::724289083ba106c33ea0854aecfd07aa
https://dspace.library.uu.nl/handle/1874/370759
https://dspace.library.uu.nl/handle/1874/370759
Publikováno v:
Computational Models of Argument: Proceedings of COMMA 2018, 313-324
STARTPAGE=313;ENDPAGE=324;TITLE=Computational Models of Argument
STARTPAGE=313;ENDPAGE=324;TITLE=Computational Models of Argument
In this paper, we present an in-depth comparative analysis of two classifications of argument schemes: Walton's typology and Wagemans' Periodic Table of Arguments. We describe annotation guidelines for each classification and apply these to a corpus
Externí odkaz:
https://explore.openaire.eu/search/publication?articleId=narcis______::040ac6158759a8fb9d69bc6fcd2bf2bd
https://dare.uva.nl/personal/pure/en/publications/revisiting-computational-models-of-argument-schemes-classification-annotation-comparison(128aeff4-f610-4f53-a220-9fbbed8ab0fc).html
https://dare.uva.nl/personal/pure/en/publications/revisiting-computational-models-of-argument-schemes-classification-annotation-comparison(128aeff4-f610-4f53-a220-9fbbed8ab0fc).html
Publikováno v:
Computational Models of Argument: Proceedings of COMMA 2018, 425-436
STARTPAGE=425;ENDPAGE=436;TITLE=Computational Models of Argument
STARTPAGE=425;ENDPAGE=436;TITLE=Computational Models of Argument
When confronted with the same abstract argumentation framework, specifying a set of arguments and an attack-relation between them, different agents may disagree on which arguments to accept, i.e., they may choose different extensions. In the context
Externí odkaz:
https://explore.openaire.eu/search/publication?articleId=narcis______::14379c5db7a3cc368183776950b9349d
https://dare.uva.nl/personal/pure/en/publications/aggregating-alternative-extensions-of-abstract-argumentation-frameworks-preservation-results-for-quota-rules(2130d2f0-7592-4684-a19b-64b822e00ea8).html
https://dare.uva.nl/personal/pure/en/publications/aggregating-alternative-extensions-of-abstract-argumentation-frameworks-preservation-results-for-quota-rules(2130d2f0-7592-4684-a19b-64b822e00ea8).html
Publikováno v:
AJPM Focus; 20240101, Issue: Preprints
Autor:
Budzynska Katarzyna, Araszkiewicz Michał, Budzyńska-Daca Agnieszka, Hinton Martin, Lawrence John, Modgil Sanjay, Thimm Matthias, Visser Jacky, Żurek Tomasz, Koszowy Marcin, Atkinson Katie, Dębowska-Kozłowska Kamila, Kacprzak Magdalena, Łupkowski Paweł, Skowron Barłomiej, Urbański Mariusz, Załęska Maria
Publikováno v:
Studies in Logic, Grammar and Rhetoric, Vol 55, Iss 1, Pp 231-239 (2018)
In September 2018, the ArgDiaP association, along with colleagues from Germany and the UK, organised one of the longest and most interdisciplinary series of events ever dedicated to argumentation - Warsaw Argumentation Week, WAW 2018. The eleven-day
Externí odkaz:
https://doaj.org/article/68e5f26fac9a48d388b041dd1828f769
Akademický článek
Tento výsledek nelze pro nepřihlášené uživatele zobrazit.
K zobrazení výsledku je třeba se přihlásit.
K zobrazení výsledku je třeba se přihlásit.
Akademický článek
Tento výsledek nelze pro nepřihlášené uživatele zobrazit.
K zobrazení výsledku je třeba se přihlásit.
K zobrazení výsledku je třeba se přihlásit.
Publikováno v:
Studies in Logic, Grammar and Rhetoric, Vol 36, Iss 1, Pp 7-22 (2014)
Pragmatics and dialectics are two disciplines which have been amongst the first and most important partners for argument studies in the exploration of the complex realm of communication. Treating argumentation as a construct consisting of premises an
Externí odkaz:
https://doaj.org/article/ce5202a66592471e9690d434ca8871c9
Publikováno v:
Scopus-Elsevier
Externí odkaz:
https://explore.openaire.eu/search/publication?articleId=dedup_wf_001::6db0414faa86d8e5b18a4b0d14267e79
http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?eid=2-s2.0-84910090714&partnerID=MN8TOARS
http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?eid=2-s2.0-84910090714&partnerID=MN8TOARS