Zobrazeno 1 - 10
of 32
pro vyhledávání: '"Bryant T Smith"'
Autor:
Ian J. Saldanha, Kristina B. Lindsley, Sarah Money, Hannah J. Kimmel, Bryant T. Smith, Kay Dickersin
Publikováno v:
BMC Medical Research Methodology, Vol 20, Iss 1, Pp 1-9 (2020)
Abstract Background There is broad recognition of the importance of evidence in informing clinical decisions. When information from all studies included in a systematic review (“review”) does not contribute to a meta-analysis, decision-makers can
Externí odkaz:
https://doaj.org/article/93163a724de04e29aab420cc88acb2b1
Publikováno v:
Systematic Reviews, Vol 8, Iss 1, Pp 1-12 (2019)
Abstract Background Conducting systematic reviews (“reviews”) requires a great deal of effort and resources. Making data extracted during reviews available publicly could offer many benefits, including reducing unnecessary duplication of effort,
Externí odkaz:
https://doaj.org/article/276332f6edac4eb68a7026909de41378
Autor:
Gaelen P. Adam, Mengyang Di, Susan Cu-Uvin, Christopher Halladay, Bryant T. Smith, Suchitra Iyer, Thomas A. Trikalinos
Publikováno v:
Systematic Reviews, Vol 7, Iss 1, Pp 1-10 (2018)
Abstract Background While in its early years the HIV epidemic affected primarily the male and the young, nowadays, the population living with HIV/AIDS is approximately 24% women, and its age composition has shifted towards older ages. Many of the old
Externí odkaz:
https://doaj.org/article/25ccfa8745f948fe9541fe5332b5e0ac
Autor:
Ian J. Saldanha, Christopher H. Schmid, Joseph Lau, Kay Dickersin, Jesse A. Berlin, Jens Jap, Bryant T. Smith, Simona Carini, Wiley Chan, Berry De Bruijn, Byron C. Wallace, Susan M. Hutfless, Ida Sim, M. Hassan Murad, Sandra A. Walsh, Elizabeth J. Whamond, Tianjing Li
Publikováno v:
Systematic Reviews, Vol 5, Iss 1, Pp 1-11 (2016)
Abstract Background Data abstraction, a critical systematic review step, is time-consuming and prone to errors. Current standards for approaches to data abstraction rest on a weak evidence base. We developed the Data Abstraction Assistant (DAA), a no
Externí odkaz:
https://doaj.org/article/3b73b29a64e8480db248cf2deb722103
Publikováno v:
Systematic Reviews, Vol 7, Iss 1, Pp 1-2 (2018)
Abstract ᅟ This is a response to a Letter. Data abstraction is a time-consuming and error-prone systematic review task. Shokraneh and Adams categorize available techniques for tracking data during data abstraction into three methods: simple annotat
Externí odkaz:
https://doaj.org/article/85d793c6acea4507a5be3f3f0b4abba2
Autor:
Valerie Rofeberg, Abhilash Gazula, Farah Moustafa, Gaelen P Adam, Thomas A Trikalinos, Bryant T Smith, Martin A. Weinstock, Aaron M. Drucker
Publikováno v:
Journal of the American Academy of Dermatology. 82:479-482
Autor:
Kay Dickersin, Kristina Lindsley, Sarah Money, Bryant T Smith, Ian J. Saldanha, Hannah J. Kimmel
Publikováno v:
BMC Medical Research Methodology, Vol 20, Iss 1, Pp 1-9 (2020)
BMC Medical Research Methodology
BMC Medical Research Methodology
Background There is broad recognition of the importance of evidence in informing clinical decisions. When information from all studies included in a systematic review (“review”) does not contribute to a meta-analysis, decision-makers can be frust
Publikováno v:
Systematic Reviews, Vol 8, Iss 1, Pp 1-12 (2019)
Systematic Reviews
Systematic Reviews
Background Conducting systematic reviews (“reviews”) requires a great deal of effort and resources. Making data extracted during reviews available publicly could offer many benefits, including reducing unnecessary duplication of effort, standardi
Publikováno v:
Research Synthesis Methods. 10:2-14
INTRODUCTION: During systematic reviews, data abstraction is labor- and time-intensive and error-prone. Existing data abstraction systems do not track specific locations and contexts of abstracted information. To address this limitation, we developed
Autor:
Thomas A Trikalinos, Aaron M. Drucker, Valerie Rofeberg, Farah Moustafa, Abhilash Gazula, Gaelen P Adam, Bryant T Smith, Martin A. Weinstock
Publikováno v:
Annals of Internal Medicine. 169:456-466
Background Most interventions for basal cell carcinoma (BCC) have not been compared in head-to-head randomized trials. Purpose To evaluate the comparative effectiveness and safety of treatments of primary BCC in adults. Data sources English-language