Zobrazeno 1 - 4
of 4
pro vyhledávání: '"Blake A. Umberham"'
Publikováno v:
Anesthesia & Analgesia. 123:1018-1025
BACKGROUND: Systematic reviews and meta-analyses are used by clinicians to derive treatment guidelines and make resource allocation decisions in anesthesiology. One cause for concern with such reviews is the possibility that results from unpublished
IntroductionHonorary authorship and equal gender representation are two pressing matters in scientific research. Honorary authorship is the inclusion of authors who do not meet the criteria established by the International Committee of Medical Journa
Externí odkaz:
https://explore.openaire.eu/search/publication?articleId=doi_dedup___::d1d5c9ea8392ed33cddc78805ac8c49b
https://doi.org/10.1101/446385
https://doi.org/10.1101/446385
Autor:
Chelsea Koller, Matt Vassar, Jody A. Worley, Sarah Khan, David Herrmann, Jonathan Holmes, Blake A. Umberham
Systematic reviews synthesize data across multiple studies to answer a research question, and an important component of the review process is to evaluate the heterogeneity of primary studies considered for inclusion. Little is known, however, about t
Externí odkaz:
https://explore.openaire.eu/search/publication?articleId=doi_dedup___::8d617e96d069fb2d49dd9a751686a2ba
https://europepmc.org/articles/PMC5349813/
https://europepmc.org/articles/PMC5349813/
Publikováno v:
Anaesthesia. 71(8)
The validity of primary study results included in systematic reviews plays an important role in drawing conclusions about intervention effectiveness and carries implications for clinical decision-making. We evaluated the prevalence of methodological