Zobrazeno 1 - 10
of 29
pro vyhledávání: '"Bert Meuffels"'
Publikováno v:
Tijdschrift voor Taalbeheersing. 37:79-96
The disguised ad baculum fallacy empirically investigated In argumentative discourse fallacies occur regularly. They often seem not to be noticed by the participants in the discourse. This also goes for the ad baculum fallacy. Threatening the other p
Autor:
Peter J. Schulz, Bert Meuffels
Publikováno v:
Tijdschrift voor Taalbeheersing. 36:239-266
Autor:
Fernando Miguel Leal Carretero, Juan Carlos Pereda Failache, Frans H. van Eemeren, Bart Garssen, Jean H. M. Wagemans, Bert Meuffels, Lilián Bermejo-Luque, Humberto Marraud González, Luis Vega Reñon, Cristián Santibáñez Yáñez, María G. Navarro, Constanza Inhen Jory, Xavier De Donato Rodríguez, Jesús Zamora Bonilla, Roberto Marafioti, Luisa Puig, Celso López Saavedra, Ana María Vicuña Navarro, Cristóbal Joannon L., Joaquín Galindo Castañeda
El líder indiscutido del programa pragma-dialéctico de investigación es el doctor Frans H. van Eemeren, quien es reconocido como la figura señera de los estudios sobre argumentación en el mundo. No existía hasta ahora una colección de artícul
Autor:
Bert Meuffels, Peter J. Schulz
Publikováno v:
Journal of Argumentation in Context, 1(1), 130-142. John Benjamins Publishing Company
This article is concerned with the reasons why sometimes good arguments in health communication leaflets fail to convince the targeted audience. As an illustrative example it uses the age-dependent eligibility of women in the Netherlands to receive r
Publikováno v:
Tijdschrift voor Taalbeheersing, 34(2), 135-155
Taalgebruikers, zo blijkt uit empirisch onderzoek, achten discussiezetten die vanuit pragmadialectisch perspectief drogredelijk van aard zijn, onredelijk. In het licht van deze empirische bevinding is het opmerkelijk dat in alledaagse discussies drog
Publikováno v:
Thinking and Reasoning, 18(3), 344-364. Taylor and Francis Ltd.
The main finding of a comprehensive empirical research project on the intersubjective acceptability of the pragma-dialectical discussion rules is that ordinary language users judge discussion moves that are considered fallacious from an argumentation
Autor:
Bert Meuffels, Peter J. Schulz
Publikováno v:
Health Communication, 27(2), 167-178. Routledge
Information campaigns on breast cancer screening in the Netherlands need to convince women above 50 years of age to have biannual mammography, and women below 50 years of age that regular mammograms are not recommended for them. This article reports
Autor:
Bert Meuffels, Peter J. Schulz
Publikováno v:
Tijdschrift voor Taalbeheersing, 33(2), 119-147, 199
Information campaigns on breast cancer screening in the Netherlands have to convince women above 50 to have biannual mammography, and women below 50 that regular mammograms are not recommended for them. This article reports the results of three exper
Autor:
Peter J. Schulz, Bert Meuffels
Publikováno v:
Journal of Communication in Healthcare, 8(1), 32-44. Maney Publishing
IntroductionInformation campaigns on breast cancer screening need to convince women above 50 years of age to have biannual mammograms, and women below 50 years of age that regular mammograms are not recommended for them. Earlier experiments in the Ne
Externí odkaz:
https://explore.openaire.eu/search/publication?articleId=doi_dedup___::b6fe9a05ebf0ff1e3896a76c266c50d3
https://dare.uva.nl/personal/pure/en/publications/differential-appraisal-of-age-thresholds-for-mammographic-screening-in-holland-and-switzerland(174c2606-1214-45f6-bfa1-aa4a244faef5).html
https://dare.uva.nl/personal/pure/en/publications/differential-appraisal-of-age-thresholds-for-mammographic-screening-in-holland-and-switzerland(174c2606-1214-45f6-bfa1-aa4a244faef5).html
Publikováno v:
Argumentation Library ISBN: 9783319209548
Reasonableness and Effectiveness in Argumentative Discourse
Reasonableness and Effectiveness in Argumentative Discourse
According to van Eemeren (Strategic maneuvering in argumentative discourse. Extending the pragma-dialectical theory of argumentation. John Benjamins, Amsterdam, 2010), the participants in argumentative discourse are in the predicament of having to re
Externí odkaz:
https://explore.openaire.eu/search/publication?articleId=doi_________::a6ed84c36d82ea6143d628eecab5dfdf
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-20955-5_42
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-20955-5_42