What matters to me – a web-based preference elicitation tool for clients in long-term care: a user-centred design

Autor: Catharina M. van Leersum, Albine Moser, Ben van Steenkiste, Marion Reinartz, Esther Stoffers, Judith R. L. M. Wolf, Trudy van der Weijden

Publikováno v: BMC Medical Informatics and Decision Making, Vol 20, Iss 1, Pp 1-12 (2020)

Abstract Background During the process of decision-making for long-term care, clients are often dependent on informal support and available information about quality ratings of care services. However, clients do not take ratings into account when con

Externí odkaz: https://doaj.org/article/db9e6a5f110a4a61bc32e9fcb20aa672

Systematic review of implementation strategies for risk tables in the prevention of cardiovascular diseases

Autor: Ben van Steenkiste, Richard Grol, Trudy van der Weijden

Publikováno v: Vascular Health and Risk Management, Vol Volume 4, Pp 535-545 (2008)

Ben van Steenkiste, Richard Grol, Trudy van der WeijdenCentre for Quality of Care Research, School for Public Health and Primary Care (Caphri), Maastricht University, Maastricht, The NetherlandsBackground: Cardiovascular disease prevention is guided

Externí odkaz: https://doaj.org/article/b3f23ebf2ffa41058748d5b0eb253148

An observational study on the process of collaborative deliberation in arranging long-term care

Autor: Albine Moser, Catharina Margaretha van Leersum, Ben van Steenkiste, Trudy van der Weijden, Judith R. L. M. Wolf

Publikováno v: Leersum, C M V, Steenkiste, B V, Wolf, J RLM, Weijden, T V D & Moser, A 2022, ' An observational study on the process of collaborative deliberation in arranging long-term care : The perception of clients and professionals ', Clinical Ethics, vol. 17, no. 3, pp. 297-310 . https://doi.org/10.1177/14777509211036647
Clinical Ethics, 17(3), 297-310. SAGE Publications Ltd

BackgroundClients are invited to play a role in decisions about their care. Collaborative deliberation comprises constructive engagement, recognition of alternative actions, comparative learning, construction and elicitation of preferences and prefer

Externí odkaz: https://explore.openaire.eu/search/publication?articleId=doi_dedup___::db29d307b89fd086f2169533a1dcf715
https://hdl.handle.net/1820/0b7ce035-5cbe-4343-aad4-059be1e1867f

What matters to me - a web-based preference elicitation tool for clients in long-term care

Autor: Albine Moser, Trudy van der Weijden, Esther Stoffers, Catharina Margaretha van Leersum, Marion Reinartz, Judith R. L. M. Wolf, Ben van Steenkiste

Publikováno v: BMC Medical Informatics and Decision Making, Vol 20, Iss 1, Pp 1-12 (2020)
BMC Medical Informatics and Decision Making, 20(1):57, 1-12. BioMed Central Ltd
BMC Medical Informatics and Decision Making
BMC Medical Informatics and Decision Making, 20, 1
BMC Medical Informatics and Decision Making, 20(57)
BMC Medical Informatics and Decision Making, 20

Background During the process of decision-making for long-term care, clients are often dependent on informal support and available information about quality ratings of care services. However, clients do not take ratings into account when considering

Externí odkaz: https://explore.openaire.eu/search/publication?articleId=doi_dedup___::87e0247ee553264dfbca5aa15d7b2d22
https://doi.org/10.1186/s12911-020-1067-6

Clients and professionals elicit long-term care preferences by using ‘What matters to me’: A process evaluation

Autor: Catharina Margaretha van Leersum, Ben van Steenkiste, Albine Moser, Judith R. L. M. Wolf, Trudy van der Weijden

Background: ‘What matters to me’ is a five-category preference elicitation tool to assist clients and professionals in choosing long-term care. This study aimed to evaluate the use of and experiences with this tool.Methods: A mixed-method process

Externí odkaz: https://explore.openaire.eu/search/publication?articleId=doi_dedup___::fb2f03232ea5ec0065f2ef63b9498fac
https://doi.org/10.21203/rs.3.rs-35163/v1