Zobrazeno 1 - 10
of 17
pro vyhledávání: '"Beatrice Krebs"'
Autor:
Beatrice Krebs
Publikováno v:
The Journal of Criminal Law. 86:420-440
Jogee established that, if the victim was attacked in a manner different to that which the accessory envisioned, the accessory will not be liable for a resulting death, provided the fatal act amounted to ‘some overwhelming supervening act [OSA]…
Externí odkaz:
https://explore.openaire.eu/search/publication?articleId=doi_________::17dfb52273780d261b6badd9416ee468
https://doi.org/10.1177/00220183221133440
https://doi.org/10.1177/00220183221133440
Autor:
Beatrice Krebs
Publikováno v:
Jurisprudence. 12:282-290
The extent of a company’s responsibility for the criminal conduct of its employees, as far as such a concept is legally recognised at all, differs between jurisdictions. There has been a shift in r...
Externí odkaz:
https://explore.openaire.eu/search/publication?articleId=doi_________::db098af5aa1d06ad7b211b8164899bd8
https://doi.org/10.1080/20403313.2021.1930375
https://doi.org/10.1080/20403313.2021.1930375
Autor:
Beatrice Krebs
Publikováno v:
The Journal of Criminal Law. 85:403-405
This is a case note on R v Lanning and Camille [2021] EWCA Crim 450. It considers the concept of ‘overwhelming supervening acts’ (OSA) and its relationship to the ‘fundamental difference rule’ (FDR).
Externí odkaz:
https://explore.openaire.eu/search/publication?articleId=doi_dedup___::d7659848c92829cc98f69e534f98c74c
https://doi.org/10.1177/00220183211044289
https://doi.org/10.1177/00220183211044289
Autor:
Beatrice Krebs, Christopher Cowley
Publikováno v:
Criminal Law and Philosophy. 14:5-8
This paper introduces the Special Issue on Recklessness and Negligence. It highlights the main issues and controversies that surround these concepts and then briefly introduces each of the papers that comprise the Special Issue.
Externí odkaz:
https://explore.openaire.eu/search/publication?articleId=doi_________::44e030a38061ad41d8fccc6a7bbbe113
https://doi.org/10.1007/s11572-019-09519-3
https://doi.org/10.1007/s11572-019-09519-3
Autor:
Beatrice Krebs
Publikováno v:
The Journal of Criminal Law. 83:406-409
Externí odkaz:
https://explore.openaire.eu/search/publication?articleId=doi_________::044f7951bbfd89e66c60f0943ba4ba52
https://doi.org/10.1177/0022018319876709
https://doi.org/10.1177/0022018319876709
Autor:
Beatrice Krebs
Publikováno v:
The Journal of Criminal Law. 83:20-23
Externí odkaz:
https://explore.openaire.eu/search/publication?articleId=doi_________::a9b5b7daf7c11c8813c1cfa573e565e7
https://doi.org/10.1177/0022018319831847
https://doi.org/10.1177/0022018319831847
Autor:
Beatrice Krebs
This is a case comment on R v Lawrance [2020] EWCA Crim 971 which held that a lie about fertility was not sufficiently closely connected to the performance of sexual intercourse so as to be able to negate consent under s. 74 of the Sexual Offences Ac
Externí odkaz:
https://explore.openaire.eu/search/publication?articleId=doi_dedup___::24ae631238a6da81954c6b9c7533ce2c
Autor:
Beatrice Krebs
Publikováno v:
The Cambridge Law Journal. 76:7-11
IN Miller v The Queen [2016] HCA 30, the High Court of Australia (HCA) declined to follow the Privy Council and UK Supreme Court (UKSC) in abolishing the doctrine of extended joint criminal enterprise, as PAL is known in South Australia. Under the Au
Externí odkaz:
https://explore.openaire.eu/search/publication?articleId=doi_________::a6572de8c39efcded7d8fb10b16a85e4
https://doi.org/10.1017/s0008197317000150
https://doi.org/10.1017/s0008197317000150
Autor:
Beatrice Krebs
Publikováno v:
The Journal of Criminal Law. 82:209-211
This paper analyses the Court of Appeal decision in R v Crilly [2018] EWCA Crim 168. This was the first out-of-time appeal after R v Jogee in which the applicant succeeded in demonstrating ‘substantial injustice’ and having his murder conviction
Externí odkaz:
https://explore.openaire.eu/search/publication?articleId=doi_________::878ab4f8c35d10569a80158cf67c01a2
https://doi.org/10.1177/0022018318779644
https://doi.org/10.1177/0022018318779644