Zobrazeno 1 - 10
of 23
pro vyhledávání: '"Anna Kaatz"'
Publikováno v:
mBio, Vol 4, Iss 2 (2013)
ABSTRACT In their study published in January 2013 in mBio, Fang et al. reviewed records from the Office of Research Integrity (ORI) and found more cases of scientific misconduct committed by men than women, particularly by faculty (F. C. Fang, J. W.
Externí odkaz:
https://doaj.org/article/b74cb0fdba164d8ba34c2377b4733857
Autor:
Elizabeth L. Pier, Mitchell J. Nathan, Molly Carnes, Amarette Filut, Cecilia E. Ford, Joshua Raclaw, Markus Brauer, Anna Kaatz
Publikováno v:
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences. 115:2952-2957
Obtaining grant funding from the National Institutes of Health (NIH) is increasingly competitive, as funding success rates have declined over the past decade. To allocate relatively scarce funds, scientific peer reviewers must differentiate the very
Autor:
Wairimu Magua, Aaron Potvien, Amarette Filut, Dastagiri Reddy Malikireddy, Molly Carnes, Xiaojin Zhu, Anna Kaatz, You-Geon Lee, Renee Leatherberry, Anupama Bhattacharya, Madeline Jens
Publikováno v:
Journal of Women's Health. 26:560-570
Women are less successful than men in renewing R01 grants from the National Institutes of Health. Continuing to probe text mining as a tool to identify gender bias in peer review, we used algorithmic text mining and qualitative analysis to examine a
Publikováno v:
Journal of Women's Health. 26:587-596
Many studies find that female faculty in academic medicine, science, and engineering experience adverse workplace climates. This study longitudinally investigates whether department climate is associated with future research productivity and whether
Publikováno v:
Personalitysocial psychology bulletin. 46(1)
Grant-writing and grant-getting are key to success in many academic disciplines, but research points to gender gaps in both, especially as careers progress. Using a sample of National Institutes of Health (NIH) K-Awardees—Principal Investigators of
Autor:
Molly Carnes, Anna Kaatz, Anupama Bhattacharya, You-Geon Lee, Amarette Filut, Aaron Potvien, Wairimu Magua, Renee Leatherberry, Xiaojin Zhu
Publikováno v:
Academic Medicine. 91:1080-1088
Prior text analysis of R01 critiques suggested that female applicants may be disadvantaged in National Institutes of Health (NIH) peer review, particularly for renewals. NIH altered its review format in 2009. The authors examined R01 critiques and sc
Publikováno v:
Journal of General Internal Medicine. 34:513-514
Publikováno v:
Academic Medicine. 90:69-75
Career advancement in academic medicine often hinges on the ability to garner research funds. The National Institutes of Health's (NIH's) R01 award is the "gold standard" of an independent research program. Studies show inconsistencies in R01 reviewe
Publikováno v:
Games for Health Journal. 3:371-378
Having diverse faculty in academic health centers will help diversify the healthcare workforce and reduce health disparities. Implicit race bias is one factor that contributes to the underrepresentation of Black faculty. We designed the videogame "Fa
Autor:
Anupama Bhattacharya, Elizabeth L. Pier, Madeline Jens, Amarette Filut, You-Geon Lee, Dastagiri Reddy Malikireddy, Anna Kaatz, Molly Carnes
Publikováno v:
ASONAM
Network analysis has widespread applications for studying many social phenomena. Our research is focused on investigating why highly qualified women and racial/ethnic minorities tend to fare worse in peer review processes, such as for scientific gran