Zobrazeno 1 - 10
of 11
pro vyhledávání: '"Andrija Babic"'
Autor:
Andrija Babic, Andela Pijuk, Lucie Brázdilová, Yuliyana Georgieva, Marco António Raposo Pereira, Tina Poklepovic Pericic, Livia Puljak
Publikováno v:
BMC Medical Research Methodology, Vol 19, Iss 1, Pp 1-10 (2019)
Abstract Background Clinical decisions are made based on Cochrane reviews, but the implementation of results of evidence syntheses such as Cochrane reviews is problematic if the evidence is not prepared consistently. All systematic reviews should ass
Externí odkaz:
https://doaj.org/article/5aa8a9c94e194141a8cd3a0c12feb7c1
Autor:
Andrija Babic, Ruzica Tokalic, João Amílcar Silva Cunha, Ivana Novak, Jelena Suto, Marin Vidak, Ivana Miosic, Ivana Vuka, Tina Poklepovic Pericic, Livia Puljak
Publikováno v:
BMC Medical Research Methodology, Vol 19, Iss 1, Pp 1-10 (2019)
Abstract Background An important part of the systematic review methodology is appraisal of the risk of bias in included studies. Cochrane systematic reviews are considered golden standard regarding systematic review methodology, but Cochrane’s inst
Externí odkaz:
https://doaj.org/article/3d61548b4b0e4f5682581d43283c6dc6
Autor:
Ema Slapnicar, Frano Saric, Tina Poklepovic Pericic, Dawid Pieper, Ivana Vuka, Andrija Babic, Ivona Proloscic, Jakica Cavar, Livia Puljak
Publikováno v:
Journal of Clinical Epidemiology. 119:57-64
Objective The objective of the study was to analyze methods of assessing “overall bias” in Cochrane reviews of interventions published in the Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews and sensitivity analyses related to overall risk of bias (RoB).
Externí odkaz:
https://explore.openaire.eu/search/publication?articleId=doi_dedup___::601ef5719a7689de026cc2691bc67a1e
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclinepi.2019.11.008
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclinepi.2019.11.008
Publikováno v:
Research synthesis methodsREFERENCES. 13(4)
Some Cochrane reviews were declared stable or closed, that is, not in need of updating. For some of them, it has been declared that conclusions will not (or it is unlikely they will) change with further studies. We explored whether there is a discern
Externí odkaz:
https://explore.openaire.eu/search/publication?articleId=doi_dedup___::c8c3650b70c0c21f510d6b7bf57f43b4
https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/35278034
https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/35278034
Autor:
Andela Pijuk, Livia Puljak, Marco Antonio Raposo Pereira, Yuliyana Georgieva, Tina Poklepovic Pericic, Lucie Brazdilova, Andrija Babic
Publikováno v:
BMC Medical Research Methodology, Vol 19, Iss 1, Pp 1-10 (2019)
BMC Medical Research Methodology
BMC Medical Research Methodology
Background Clinical decisions are made based on Cochrane reviews, but the implementation of results of evidence syntheses such as Cochrane reviews is problematic if the evidence is not prepared consistently. All systematic reviews should assess the r
Externí odkaz:
https://explore.openaire.eu/search/publication?articleId=doi_dedup___::fa053239a1a13f5fe8651728dd90b28b
http://link.springer.com/article/10.1186/s12874-019-0718-8
http://link.springer.com/article/10.1186/s12874-019-0718-8
Limiting the search period in methodological studies
Externí odkaz:
https://explore.openaire.eu/search/publication?articleId=doi_dedup___::5a80c35286f5c39c343fab9477ef9a35
https://www.bib.irb.hr/1070342
https://www.bib.irb.hr/1070342
Autor:
Marija Radman, Livia Puljak, Lorenzo Moja, Milka Jerić, Antonia Jelicic Kadic, Edita Runjic, Andrija Babic
Background and objective We explored how systematic reviews evaluated paracetamol and ibuprofen for treating pain in children, as these two non-opioid analgesics are well-established medicines included in most national essential medicines lists. Data
Externí odkaz:
https://explore.openaire.eu/search/publication?articleId=doi_dedup___::6333ee0bceffa1b6a6134fb45bec373e
https://www.bib.irb.hr/1066783
https://www.bib.irb.hr/1066783
Autor:
Tina Poklepovic, Andela Pijuk, Marco Antonio Raposo Pereira, Andrija Babic, Yuliyana Georgieva, Lucie Brazdilova, Livia Puljak
BackgroundClinical decisions are made based on Cochrane systematic reviews (CSRs), but implementation of results of evidence syntheses such as CSRs is problematic if the evidence is not prepared consistently. All systematic reviews should assess risk
Externí odkaz:
https://explore.openaire.eu/search/publication?articleId=doi_dedup___::deb72d7e2634c9db8bc539a4af29f637
https://doi.org/10.1101/366591
https://doi.org/10.1101/366591
Autor:
Tina Poklepovic Pericic, Jelena Suto, Joao Amilcar Silva Cunha, Ivana Vuka, Ruzica Tokalic, Livia Puljak, Marin Vidak, Andrija Babic, Ivana Miosic, Ivana Novak
BackgroundAn important part of the systematic review methodology is appraisal of the risk of bias in included studies. Cochrane systematic reviews (CSRs) are considered golden standard regarding systematic review methodology, but Cochrane’s instruc
Externí odkaz:
https://explore.openaire.eu/search/publication?articleId=doi_dedup___::926a31feeaccbfb359eec6284fdeabb5
https://doi.org/10.1101/366658
https://doi.org/10.1101/366658
Autor:
Livia Puljak, Marin Vidak, Ivana Miosic, Ivana Novak, Tina Poklepovic Pericic, Ruzica Tokalic, Ivana Vuka, Joao Amilcar Silva Cunha, Andrija Babic, Jelena Suto
Publikováno v:
BMC Medical Research Methodology
BMC Medical Research Methodology, Vol 19, Iss 1, Pp 1-10 (2019)
BMC Medical Research Methodology, Vol 19, Iss 1, Pp 1-10 (2019)
Background An important part of the systematic review methodology is appraisal of the risk of bias in included studies. Cochrane systematic reviews are considered golden standard regarding systematic review methodology, but Cochrane’s instructions
Externí odkaz:
https://explore.openaire.eu/search/publication?articleId=doi_dedup___::250821ebc2015d744ae4e1d523fbfc85
https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/30953448
https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/30953448