A multicentric study on stigma towards people with mental illness in health sciences students

Autor: Berta Moreno-Küstner, Miguel Xavier, Pamela Grandón, Sandra Saldivia, Alexis Vielma-Aguilera, Elvis Siprian Castro-Alzate, Cristina Romero-López-Alberca, Ana I. Masedo, Claudio Bustos, J. Miguel Pena-Andreu

Publikováno v: BMC Medical Education
Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal
Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (RCAAP)
instacron:RCAAP
BMC Med Educ 21, 324 (2021)
RODIN. Repositorio de Objetos de Docencia e Investigación de la Universidad de Cádiz
instname
BMC Medical Education, Vol 21, Iss 1, Pp 1-11 (2021)

Background There is evidence of negative attitudes among health professionals towards people with mental illness but there is also a knowledge gap on what training must be given to these health professionals during their education. The purpose of thi

Externí odkaz: https://explore.openaire.eu/search/publication?articleId=doi_dedup___::9914328bc6edc4fb9ca96a32316d5624
http://europepmc.org/articles/PMC8183042

Pain interference in persons with spinal cord injury: classification of mild, moderate, and severe pain

Autor: Diana D. Cardenas, Ana I. Masedo, Mark P. Jensen, Judith A. Turner, Marisol A. Hanley

Publikováno v: The journal of pain. 7(2)

Pain intensity is commonly measured by patient ratings on numerical rating scales (NRS). However, grouping such ratings into categories may be useful for guiding treatment decisions or interpreting clinical trial outcomes. The purpose of this study w

Externí odkaz: https://explore.openaire.eu/search/publication?articleId=doi_dedup___::87003b6ba0f7e4a4ff698113d8f8cf81
https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/16459278

Some empirical evidence regarding the validity of the Spanish version of the McGill Pain Questionnaire (MPQ-SV)

Autor: Rosa Esteve, Ana I. Masedo

Publikováno v: PainReferences. 85(3)

Despite the fact that the McGill Pain Questionnaire (MPQ) is a useful pain assessment tool with widespread acceptance, empirical analyses have questioned its validity because they have not consistently supported the three a priori factors that guided

Externí odkaz: https://explore.openaire.eu/search/publication?articleId=doi_dedup___::ccc72a3530879093130f53860a9d5cab
https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/10781918

Reliability and Validity of a Self-Report FIM™ (FIM-SR) in Persons with Amputation or Spinal Cord Injury and Chronic Pain.

Autor: Ana I Masedo

Publikováno v: American Journal of Physical Medicine & Rehabilitation; Mar2005, Vol. 84 Issue 3, p167-176, 10p