Zobrazeno 1 - 10
of 70
pro vyhledávání: '"Albert Casullo"'
Autor:
Albert Casullo
Publikováno v:
Metaphysics, Vol 2, Iss 1 (2020)
In 'Necessary Beings', Bob Hale addresses two questions: What is the source of necessity? What is the source of our knowledge of it? He offers novel responses to them in terms of the metaphysical notion of 'nature' or, more familiarly, 'essence'. In
Externí odkaz:
https://doaj.org/article/77f966b3816f4c178388423c2d0eb98b
Autor:
Albert Casullo
Publikováno v:
Res Philosophica. 97:593-609
Externí odkaz:
https://explore.openaire.eu/search/publication?articleId=doi_________::85436f5b60c60f995ed8014b35861606
https://doi.org/10.11612/resphil.1940
https://doi.org/10.11612/resphil.1940
Autor:
Albert Casullo
Publikováno v:
The Routledge Handbook of Modality ISBN: 9781315742144
The Routledge Handbook of Modality
The Routledge Handbook of Modality
Externí odkaz:
https://explore.openaire.eu/search/publication?articleId=doi_________::b84ad4243067a9b812abf2c03430e73d
https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315742144-23
https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315742144-23
Autor:
Albert Casullo
Publikováno v:
Synthese. 195:2897-2906
Scott Sturgeon has recently challenged Pollock’s account of undercutting defeaters. The challenge involves three primary contentions: (1) the account is both too strong and too weak, (2) undercutting defeaters exercise their power to defeat only in
Externí odkaz:
https://explore.openaire.eu/search/publication?articleId=doi_________::f655c48c021b5ec68e9c98b508b8dd96
https://doi.org/10.1007/s11229-016-1073-5
https://doi.org/10.1007/s11229-016-1073-5
Autor:
Albert Casullo
Publikováno v:
Oxford Studies in Epistemology Volume 6
Kant contends that necessity is a criterion of the a priori—that is, that all knowledge of necessary propositions is a priori. This contention, together with two others that Kant took to be evident—we know some mathematical propositions and such
Externí odkaz:
https://explore.openaire.eu/search/publication?articleId=doi_________::557552bfccb63f0c988dbba78ce2f634
https://doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780198833314.003.0003
https://doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780198833314.003.0003
Autor:
Albert Casullo
Publikováno v:
Philosophical Studies. 173:1705-1720
This is my response to the papers by Chris Pincock, Lisa Warenski and Jonathan Weinberg, which were presented at the Book Symposium on my Essays on A Priori Knowledge and Justification, American Philosophical Association Pacific Division Meetings, Ma
Externí odkaz:
https://explore.openaire.eu/search/publication?articleId=doi_________::8f1253bb9eac8d3c5737a23a816e9227
https://doi.org/10.1007/s11098-015-0590-2
https://doi.org/10.1007/s11098-015-0590-2
Autor:
Albert Casullo
Publikováno v:
Philosophical Studies. 169:509-523
David Henderson and Terry Horgan offer a detailed account of the structure of conceptual analysis that is embedded within a more general account of a priori justification. Their account highlights an important feature of conceptual analysis that has
Externí odkaz:
https://explore.openaire.eu/search/publication?articleId=doi_________::c0acbf8381420b0699f07cce7783afee
https://doi.org/10.1007/s11098-013-0239-y
https://doi.org/10.1007/s11098-013-0239-y
Autor:
Albert Casullo
Publikováno v:
Mind. 119:805-810
Externí odkaz:
https://explore.openaire.eu/search/publication?articleId=doi_________::4d7d20745f5b51995d2ed0f3eda3e1e1
https://doi.org/10.1093/mind/fzq049
https://doi.org/10.1093/mind/fzq049
Autor:
Albert Casullo
Publikováno v:
Philosophical Studies. 142:77-90
There are four approaches to analyzing the concept of a priori knowledge. The primary target of the reductive approach is the concept of a priori justification. The primary target of the nonreductive approach is the concept of a priori knowledge. The
Externí odkaz:
https://explore.openaire.eu/search/publication?articleId=doi_________::b0cea2213ab641f2cc84c03360ce6063
https://doi.org/10.1007/s11098-008-9302-5
https://doi.org/10.1007/s11098-008-9302-5
Autor:
Albert Casullo
Publikováno v:
The Philosophical Quarterly. 58:336-343
Joshua Thurow offers a defence of the claim that if a belief is defeasible by non-experiential evidence then it is defeasible by experiential evidence. He responds to an objection which I make against this claim, and offers two arguments in support o
Externí odkaz:
https://explore.openaire.eu/search/publication?articleId=doi_________::d0ce9ef8aed36cc1dceb72758f3a1dd6
https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9213.2007.512.x
https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9213.2007.512.x