Zobrazeno 1 - 10
of 526
pro vyhledávání: '"Advocate General"'
Autor:
Silverman, Jon, author, Sherwood, Robert, author
Publikováno v:
Safe Haven : The United Kingdom's Investigations into Nazi Collaborators and the Failure of Justice, 2023.
Externí odkaz:
https://doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780192855176.003.0002
Publikováno v:
EU Procedural Law, 2023.
Externí odkaz:
https://doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780198833086.003.0020
Autor:
Eun Hye Kim
Publikováno v:
European Papers, Vol 2023 8, Iss 1, Pp 1-8 (2023)
(Series Information) European Papers - A Journal on Law and Integration, 2023 8(1), 1-8 | European Forum Highlight of 28 March 2023 | (Abstract) When exactly can an impediment to effective competition be considered "significant" enough, if caused by
Externí odkaz:
https://doaj.org/article/1b331aa2b77643f3853e47e30c631296
Autor:
Alexia Pato
Publikováno v:
Verfassungsblog, Iss 2366-7044 (2022)
On 6 October 2022, Advocate General Campos Sánchez-Bordona delivered his Opinion in case C‑300/21. At stake is the interpretation of Article 82 of the General Data Protection Regulation, which provides compensation for non-material damages. The Op
Externí odkaz:
https://doaj.org/article/323b142212bd4a61beea761ce17c5152
Autor:
Marco Blocher
Publikováno v:
Verfassungsblog, Iss 2366-7044 (2022)
Die in Art. 82 Abs. 1 DSGVO vorgesehene Ersatzfähigkeit immaterieller Schäden aus DSGVO-Verletzungen sorgt vor den Gerichten der Mitgliedstaaten für beträchtliche Unsicherheiten, was sich in gegenwärtig neun Vorabentscheidungsersuchen an den EuG
Externí odkaz:
https://doaj.org/article/0995882670f74fdaa1a342c571230581
Autor:
CARTER, CHAD C.1
Publikováno v:
Procurement Lawyer. Summer2011, Vol. 46 Issue 4, p1-34. 5p.
Autor:
Dominik Dworniczak, Hubert Bekisz
Publikováno v:
Verfassungsblog, Iss 2366-7044 (2022)
Under the GDPR, Article 82 is the only instrument to claim compensation resulting from data protection infringements. So far, it has not been interpreted by the CJEU. To date, nine preliminary references on the interpretation of Article 82 have been
Externí odkaz:
https://doaj.org/article/985489c0486246ff83c5d1e9d17a1e40
Autor:
Martin Nettesheim
Publikováno v:
Verfassungsblog, Iss 2366-7044 (2022)
It is rare for two Advocates General of the European Court of Justice to differ on the interpretation of a fundamental legal act of the European Union (EU). This is what recently occurred with regard to the General Data Protection Regulation.
Externí odkaz:
https://doaj.org/article/eb9ae2e920f142209d63e1652d0c58d3
Autor:
Ionela-Alina ZORZOANĂ
Publikováno v:
Challenges of the Knowledge Society, Vol 14, Iss 1, Pp 534-537 (2021)
This study proposes a post factum analysis (or rather a final conclusion) of the solution ruled in Case C-648 Hidroelectrica, a case that came before the Court of Justice of the European Union1 , as a preliminary question referred to by the Bucharest
Externí odkaz:
https://doaj.org/article/b0f9418e15e74ea689ab3a5c6e00916a
Autor:
Marta Simoncini, Giuseppe Martinico
Publikováno v:
Politics and Governance, Vol 9, Iss 1, Pp 27-36 (2021)
What was the role of the Court of Justice of the European Union (CJEU) in the Brexit saga? And what will the impact of Brexit be over the future structure and activity of the CJEU? This article deals with this twofold question and explores three diff
Externí odkaz:
https://doaj.org/article/730e1f8008a54190aa02d88193ec688f