Zobrazeno 1 - 8
of 8
pro vyhledávání: '"Adriana Placani"'
Autor:
Adriana Placani
Publikováno v:
Public Governance, Administration and Finances Law Review, Vol 8, Iss 2, Pp 5-16 (2023)
Understanding prescriptive rules is important for understanding the law given that much of law is prescriptive. This work in legal philosophy aims to promote such understanding by offering an analysis of prescriptive rules. It does so by showing what
Externí odkaz:
https://doaj.org/article/0ad005a62c0b4df792e41038c591112d
Autor:
Adriana Placani, Stearns Broadhead
Publikováno v:
European Journal of Analytic Philosophy, Vol 16, Iss 1, Pp 53-74 (2020)
It appears at least intuitively appropriate to claim that we owe it to victims to punish those who have wronged them. It also seems plausible to state that we owe it to society to punish those who have violated its norms. However, do we also owe puni
Externí odkaz:
https://doaj.org/article/cdc6c0fe771b49679f14a807f19e64fb
Autor:
Adriana Placani
Publikováno v:
Phenomenology and Mind, Iss 13 (2017)
This paper examines the distinction between constitutive and regulative rules by way of the philosophical dispute between John Searle and Joseph Raz. These theorists disagree inasmuch as Searle claims that constitutive and regulative rules represent
Externí odkaz:
https://doaj.org/article/d34b1db681b749258d047486ec27ee9d
Autor:
Adriana Placani, Stearns Broadhead
This volume bridges contemporary philosophical conceptions of risk and responsibility and offers an extensive examination of the topic. It shows that risk and responsibility combine in ways that give rise to new philosophical questions and problems.P
Autor:
Adriana Placani, Stearns Broadhead
Publikováno v:
World Futures. 77:405-417
Carbon offsetting remains contentious within, at least, philosophy. By posing and then answering a general question about an aspect of the morality of carbon offsetting—Does carbon offsetting make ...
Externí odkaz:
https://explore.openaire.eu/search/publication?articleId=doi_dedup___::8cdf8cad85f94e5237e91399e8335f73
https://doi.org/10.1080/02604027.2021.1969876
https://doi.org/10.1080/02604027.2021.1969876
Autor:
Adriana Placani
Publikováno v:
Disputatio. 12:167-180
This work offers a challenge to the orthodox view that descriptive rules are non-normative and passive in their role and usage. It does so by arguing that, although lacking in normativity themselves, descriptive rules can be sources of normativity by
Externí odkaz:
https://explore.openaire.eu/search/publication?articleId=doi_________::8898956611f41f66149cbcb57ae5ca5c
https://doi.org/10.2478/disp-2020-0007
https://doi.org/10.2478/disp-2020-0007
Autor:
Adriana Placani, Stearns Broadhead
Publikováno v:
SSRN Electronic Journal.
This work shows that two problems—the reference class and the mental state of the agent—undermine the plausibility of the ‘blameworthiness tracks risk thesis’ (BTRT), which states, prima facie, an agent is more blameworthy for imposing a grea
Externí odkaz:
https://explore.openaire.eu/search/publication?articleId=doi_dedup___::d6f9dfe300d124da388d4e685a6e87ab
https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3789627
https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3789627
Autor:
Adriana Placani
Publikováno v:
Law and Philosophy. 36(1):77-100
This essay answers two questions that continue to drive debate in moral and legal philosophy; namely, ‘Is a risk of harm a wrong?’ and ‘Is a risk of harm a harm?’. The essay’s central claim is that to risk harm can be both to wrong and to h
Externí odkaz:
https://explore.openaire.eu/search/publication?articleId=doi_dedup___::44d753ea3b4fec5445bc8818aa7399ce