Why is it so difficult to implement a longitudinal clinical reasoning curriculum? A multicenter interview study on the barriers perceived by European health professions educators

Autor: Steven J. Durning, Daniel Hartmann, Sören Huwendiek, Nils Thiessen, Andrzej A. Kononowicz, Ada Frankowska, Martin Adler, Samuel Edelbring, Inga Hege, Monika Sobočan, Malgorzata Sudacka, Felicitas L. Wagner

Publikováno v: BMC Medical Education
BMC Medical Education, Vol 21, Iss 1, Pp 1-10 (2021)
Sudacka, Małgorzata; Adler, Martin; Durning, Steven J.; Edelbring, Samuel; Frankowska, Ada; Hartmann, Daniel; Hege, Inga; Huwendiek, Sören; Sobočan, Monika; Thiessen, Nils; Wagner, Felicitas L.; Kononowicz, Andrzej A. (2021). Why is it so difficult to implement a longitudinal clinical reasoning curriculum? A multicenter interview study on the barriers perceived by European health professions educators. BMC medical education, 21(1), p. 575. BioMed Central 10.1186/s12909-021-02960-w

Background Effective clinical reasoning is a core competency of health professionals that is necessary to assure patients’ safety. Unfortunately, adoption of longitudinal clinical reasoning curricula is still infrequent. This study explores the bar

Externí odkaz: https://explore.openaire.eu/search/publication?articleId=doi_dedup___::d695f1a7d085a7d70728c852c9bbacaf
https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/34772405