Zobrazeno 1 - 10
of 65
pro vyhledávání: '"AM Bagnall"'
Autor:
S Oliver, AM Bagnall, J Thomas, J Shepherd, A Sowden, I White, J Dinnes, R Rees, J Colquitt, K Oliver, Z Garrett
Publikováno v:
Health Technology Assessment, Vol 14, Iss 16 (2010)
Objectives: To determine whether randomised controlled trials (RCTs) lead to the same effect size and variance as non-randomised studies (NRSs) of similar policy interventions, and whether these findings can be explained by other factors associated w
Externí odkaz:
https://doaj.org/article/ca73214769dc4df48c0c91b66d57102b
Background Despite growing interest in understanding complex systems and public health interventions, research methodologies that take account of system-wide action are relatively underdeveloped. Community-based participatory research (CBPR) is steer
Externí odkaz:
https://explore.openaire.eu/search/publication?articleId=doi_dedup___::8841888728eb9e33dfc1d2783d144214
https://eprints.leedsbeckett.ac.uk/id/eprint/6837/1/AnExampleOfInvolvingLayPeopleToEnhanceComplexPublicHealthInterventionEvaluationsAM-SOUTHBY.pdf
https://eprints.leedsbeckett.ac.uk/id/eprint/6837/1/AnExampleOfInvolvingLayPeopleToEnhanceComplexPublicHealthInterventionEvaluationsAM-SOUTHBY.pdf
Impact of a community empowerment programme in disadvantaged UK neighbourhoods : results of a survey
Background A community empowerment programme in the UK aims to enable people to have greater collective control over area-based decision making, improved health and wellbeing and reduce health inequalities, by providing small grants to support reside
Externí odkaz:
https://explore.openaire.eu/search/publication?articleId=doi_dedup___::ca1fa29a120556fc8ff8dd1766882515
https://eprints.leedsbeckett.ac.uk/id/eprint/6831/1/ImpactOfACommunityEmpowermentProgrammeInDisadvantagedUKNeighbourhoodsAM-BAGNALL.pdf
https://eprints.leedsbeckett.ac.uk/id/eprint/6831/1/ImpactOfACommunityEmpowermentProgrammeInDisadvantagedUKNeighbourhoodsAM-BAGNALL.pdf
Publikováno v:
Poster presentations.
Background Case studies involve up-close, in-depth, and detailed examination of a subject (the case) and related contextual conditions. They can capture lay perspectives and provide a ‘thick’ description of not just public health programme outcom
Autor:
B Mitchell, Jane South, S Di Martino, Andy Pennington, AM Bagnall, K Southby, G Pilkington, Rhiannon Corcoran
Publikováno v:
European Journal of Public Health. 29
Background ‘Boosting social relations’ in communities has been identified as a priority UK policy-related topic. An earlier scoping review identified evidence gaps in social relations & community infrastructure. We undertook a mixed method system
Publikováno v:
Oral presentations.
Background Deliberative methods, such as citizen juries, are used in public policy as a form of democratic engagement. Because they stimulate dialogue between actors and allow consideration of different evidence sources including lived experience, su
Autor:
Rhiannon Corcoran, S Di Martino, AM Bagnall, K Southby, Andy Pennington, G Pilkington, B Mitchell, Jane South
Publikováno v:
Oral presentations.
Background: Stakeholder engagement for the What Works Centre for Wellbeing’s (WWCW) Community Wellbeing Evidence Programme identified ‘boosting social relations’ in communities as a priority policy-related topic. A scoping review of 34 reviews
Publikováno v:
SSM annual scientific meeting 2017.
Background A recent systematic review found that initiatives with high levels of community engagement may produce more positive health outcomes than those with lower engagement. Systematic reviews in this area risk publication bias because (i) litera
Publikováno v:
Neighbourhoods and communities.
Background Ten years on from Morgan and Ziglio’s call to revitalise the evidence base for public health through an asset model, there are still gaps in understanding about how best to evaluate asset-based approaches. The demand for better evidence
Autor:
Jane South, AM Bagnall, Karen Vinall-Collier, Gary Raine, Claire Hulme, Karina Kinsella, James Woodall
Publikováno v:
European Journal of Public Health. 24