Zobrazeno 1 - 10
of 47
pro vyhledávání: '"A. N. S. Lane"'
Autor:
Anthony N. S. Lane
Publikováno v:
Tyndale Bulletin, Vol 69, Iss 2 (2018)
Justification was a key issue at the Reformation, and Protestants and Catholics have polarised over it. There was a brief moment of agreement at the Regensburg Colloquy in 1541, but this was swept away by the Council of Trent, whose Decree on Justifi
Externí odkaz:
https://doaj.org/article/8584983d81ec47089914817013f03504
Autor:
Anthony N. S. Lane
Publikováno v:
Reformation & Renaissance Review. 22:112-125
Martin Luther was negative towards Article 5 of the Regensburg Colloquy (1541), calling it an inconsistent patchwork. Yet a detailed comparison of the article with Luther’s own works shows that alm...
Autor:
Anthony N. S. Lane
Publikováno v:
Tyndale Bulletin, Vol 55, Iss 1 (2004)
The direct evidence from the first century is insufficient to establish conclusively whether or not the apostolic church baptised babies. An alternative approach is to look at the practice of the post-apostolic church and to ask what must have happen
Externí odkaz:
https://doaj.org/article/bec6f92cd224489e871a9d59a890fbc1
Autor:
Anthony N. S. Lane
Publikováno v:
The Regensburg Article 5 on Justification
This chapter places Article 5 in its wider context. First it considers the colloquies prior to Regensburg. Then it describes the Regensburg Colloquy prior to Article 5, focusing especially on the participants in the debates (Bucer, Melanchthon, Pisto
Externí odkaz:
https://explore.openaire.eu/search/publication?articleId=doi_________::54e2beb80adfdecc46e99e004aedccde
https://doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780190069421.003.0002
https://doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780190069421.003.0002
Autor:
Anthony N. S. Lane
Publikováno v:
The Regensburg Article 5 on Justification
This chapter contains the Latin text of Article 5, together with a sentence by sentence commentary. This commentary draws upon the six debaters (Bucer, Melanchthon, Pistorius, Gropper, Eck, Pflug), together with Contarini, Calvin, Luther and Pighius.
Externí odkaz:
https://explore.openaire.eu/search/publication?articleId=doi_________::e961459f23b6ad8f8fca532202bc35a5
https://doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780190069421.003.0006
https://doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780190069421.003.0006
Autor:
Anthony N. S. Lane
This chapter sets out the ongoing debates over justification in the aftermath of Article 5. From 1541 to 1543 Bucer engaged in a literary controversy over the article with Eck and Pighius. There followed the controversy surrounding the attempted Colo
Externí odkaz:
https://explore.openaire.eu/search/publication?articleId=doi_________::eb32d14b8b8762ef5353d44b66be375c
https://doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780190069421.003.0004
https://doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780190069421.003.0004
Autor:
Anthony N. S. Lane
Publikováno v:
The Regensburg Article 5 on Justification
This chapter sets out the reactions to Article 5. It starts with contemporary Protestant reactions, focusing especially on Luther, Calvin, and Melanchthon. This section includes an account of all the Protestant objections, which are considered in the
Externí odkaz:
https://explore.openaire.eu/search/publication?articleId=doi_________::3efcc15fd17162112469f278e73a3064
https://doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780190069421.003.0003
https://doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780190069421.003.0003
Autor:
Anthony N. S. Lane
In 1541 at the Regensburg Colloquy, three leading Protestant theologians (Melanchthon, Bucer, and Pistorius) and three leading Catholic theologians (Eck, Gropper, and Pflug) debated with the aim of producing a commonly agreed statement of belief. The
Externí odkaz:
https://explore.openaire.eu/search/publication?articleId=doi_________::102a278d844e1e6395613d9836e49ce7
https://doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780190069421.001.0001
https://doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780190069421.001.0001
Autor:
Anthony N. S. Lane
In 1541, at the Regensburg Colloquy, three leading Protestant theologians (Melanchthon, Bucer, and Pistorius) and three leading Catholic theologians (Eck, Gropper, and Pflug) debated with the aim of producing a joint statement of belief. The colloquy
Externí odkaz:
https://explore.openaire.eu/search/publication?articleId=doi_________::f712467d0c51a9c57b0745f36910f7f6
https://doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780190069421.003.0001
https://doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780190069421.003.0001
Autor:
Anthony N. S. Lane
Publikováno v:
The Regensburg Article 5 on Justification
This chapter aims to resolve the question posed in the title: is Article 5 an inconsistent patchwork or does it retain the substance of true doctrine? A number of issues are considered: doctrines that have not been covered, ambiguities, duplex iustit
Externí odkaz:
https://explore.openaire.eu/search/publication?articleId=doi_________::8937de02d83d98b358a3bb9aaf9cc732
https://doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780190069421.003.0007
https://doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780190069421.003.0007