Zobrazeno 1 - 10
of 15
pro vyhledávání: '"A. J. E. Jaffey"'
Autor:
A. J. E. Jaffey
Publikováno v:
Legal Studies. 5:77-103
Normally one person is not obliged to confer a benefit on another unless he has promised to do so. Even if he did promise to confer the benefit, he will not normally be liable for failing to confer it if the promisee gave no consideration for the pro
Externí odkaz:
https://explore.openaire.eu/search/publication?articleId=doi_________::37ee4dd12f04f5b6c4a05691c3bc3fa3
https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1748-121x.1985.tb00323.x
https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1748-121x.1985.tb00323.x
Autor:
A. J. E. Jaffey
Publikováno v:
The Modern Law Review. 41:38-50
Externí odkaz:
https://explore.openaire.eu/search/publication?articleId=doi_________::8af4c5577602906c822f5ee491748805
https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-2230.1978.tb00785.x
https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-2230.1978.tb00785.x
Autor:
A. J. E. Jaffey
Publikováno v:
International and Comparative Law Quarterly. 32:500-505
Externí odkaz:
https://explore.openaire.eu/search/publication?articleId=doi_________::396f78d920130e73e3cd6c7c72decd98
https://doi.org/10.1093/iclqaj/32.2.500
https://doi.org/10.1093/iclqaj/32.2.500
Autor:
A. J. E. Jaffey
Publikováno v:
The Modern Law Review. 48:465-471
Externí odkaz:
https://explore.openaire.eu/search/publication?articleId=doi_________::4a397d35002378fea2b85169c6098643
https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-2230.1985.tb00855.x
https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-2230.1985.tb00855.x
Autor:
A. J. E. Jaffey
Publikováno v:
International and Comparative Law Quarterly. 24:603-616
First, there are questions which in English law would come under the category of " offer and acceptance." Here we are concerned with the legal effect which is to be attributed to the communications of the parties. The question is whether, having rega
Externí odkaz:
https://explore.openaire.eu/search/publication?articleId=doi_________::a7f58d5a91640cba8ab98c61fa65a719
https://doi.org/10.1093/iclqaj/24.4.603
https://doi.org/10.1093/iclqaj/24.4.603
Autor:
A. J. E. Jaffey
Publikováno v:
The Cambridge Law Journal. 42:37-41
Externí odkaz:
https://explore.openaire.eu/search/publication?articleId=doi_________::081fd2bc667b0cb65b7b085f3bd9b1a5
https://doi.org/10.1017/s0008197300109201
https://doi.org/10.1017/s0008197300109201
Autor:
A. J. E. Jaffey
Publikováno v:
The Cambridge Law Journal. 44:87-110
The recent decision of the House of Lords in Titchener v. British Railways Board (which will be considered below) is a reminder of the uncertainty that strangely still surrounds the defence of consent or volenti nonfit injuria to an action in neglige
Externí odkaz:
https://explore.openaire.eu/search/publication?articleId=doi_________::eb50c4da6097733d7488411bf666691f
https://doi.org/10.1017/s000819730011445x
https://doi.org/10.1017/s000819730011445x
Autor:
A. J. E. Jaffey
Publikováno v:
Oxford Journal of Legal Studies. 2:368-392
This article is concerned with the objectives which underlie choice of law rules in the conflict of laws. The discussion will be confined to aspects of contract, tort and marriage law. In the United States, particularly, much is made of the interests
Externí odkaz:
https://explore.openaire.eu/search/publication?articleId=doi_________::97706d6bf51f1747c8ff4d8386bb963d
https://doi.org/10.1093/ojls/2.3.368
https://doi.org/10.1093/ojls/2.3.368
Autor:
Anthony J. E. Jaffey
Publikováno v:
International and Comparative Law Quarterly. 33:531-557
THE EEC Convention on the Law Applicable to Contractual Obligations,1 recently signed by the United Kingdom, has not been well received by some lawyers in this country. The object of this article is to try to show that the main provision of the Conve
Externí odkaz:
https://explore.openaire.eu/search/publication?articleId=doi_________::da64afd347a23c3682aa15dbc57009bc
https://doi.org/10.1093/iclqaj/33.3.531
https://doi.org/10.1093/iclqaj/33.3.531
Autor:
A. J. E. Jaffey
Publikováno v:
Legal Studies. 2:98-117
The English choice of law rules for tort cannot be stated with any certainty. The most likely version, as a result of Chplin v Boys, is a double actionability rule, with provision for a proper law or ‘interests’ approach in exceptional cases, but
Externí odkaz:
https://explore.openaire.eu/search/publication?articleId=doi_________::e0db14a948b7a23a8af9346025b80390
https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1748-121x.1982.tb00282.x
https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1748-121x.1982.tb00282.x