Zobrazeno 1 - 3
of 3
pro vyhledávání: '"14(3)"'
Autor:
Crowther, Caroline A.1,2,3 c.crowther@auckland.ac.nz, Ashwood, Pat2,3, McPhee, Andrew J.2,4, Flenady, Vicki5, Tran, Thach2,6, Dodd, Jodie M.2,3, Robinson, Jeffrey S.2,3, null, null, PROGRESS Study Group (CORPORATE AUTHOR)
Publikováno v:
PLoS Medicine. 9/26/2017, Vol. 14 Issue 9, p1-18. 18p. 1 Diagram, 5 Charts.
Autor:
Wipfli, Rolf1, Dubois-Ferrière, Victor2 victor.dubois-ferriere@hcuge.ch, Budry, Sylvain3, Hoffmeyer, Pierre2,3, Lovis, Christian1,3
Publikováno v:
PLoS ONE. 4/15/2016, Vol. 11 Issue 4, p1-10. 10p.
Publikováno v:
von Allmen, Regula S.; Tinner, Christian; Schmidli, Jürg; Tevaearai, Hendrik T.; Dick, Florian (2019). Randomized controlled comparison of cross-sectional survey approaches to optimize follow-up completeness in clinical studies. PLoS ONE, 14(3), e0213822. Public Library of Science 10.1371/journal.pone.0213822
PLoS ONE
PLoS ONE, Vol 14, Iss 3, p e0213822 (2019)
PLoS ONE
PLoS ONE, Vol 14, Iss 3, p e0213822 (2019)
INTRODUCTION In outcome research, incomplete follow-up is a major, yet potentially correctable source of bias. Cross-sectional surveys may theoretically increase completeness of follow-up, but low response rates are reported typically. We investigate